Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some are of the opinion that people are naturally born as good leaders while others feel that leadership skills can be learned. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

There is a hotly-debated issue over whether some factors moulding an eminent leader ought to be determined at birth or leadership skills can be acquired. From my perspective, I completely agree that it is through considerable effort and real-life experience that enhance these skills.

There are two principal culprits why I hold a firm belief that everyone is capable of possessing fundamental leadership traits, with the aid of proper learning and training. The first and perhaps the most persuasive reason is that many educational institutions offer invaluable programmes relating to leadership skills. Specifically, working with other teammates in a group discussion, along with attaining knowledge from professionals in related domains will make it possible for people, especially youngsters, to maximise their potential. Consequently, they are likely to comprehend the way to make the most of their powers, understanding how to make decisions or deliver inspiring speeches. In addition, having a breadth of experience and understanding about varied fields is also considered as a prerequisite for characterising conscientious, persistent and courageous men in charge. In other words, the more hardships they encounter, the more eloquent and assertive a person they will become, since these exposure can hone their headship skills. Such in-depth expertise is the result of being cultivated through schooling and practical lessons.

However, some opponents may insist that innate personalities people are endowed with act as a more contributory factor to the formation of impeccable leaders. It is believed by a section of the public that certain people are born to be charismatic, extroverted and able to capture others’ attention effortlessly, thus placing them high on the agenda for chief positions by means of these natural characteristics. Apparently, this view is partly true; nevertheless, they fail to take into account the fact that not only natural features but the existing environment also has an enormous impact. As a matter of fact, communication skill, problem-solving skill and strategic intelligence required to be a head are not human instincts, on the grounds that these can only be derived from competitive working ambience, decision-making procedures and mistakes we have made and learn from them.

In conclusion, from the aforementioned points, it is my reaffirmation that the influence of learning and experiencing plays an indispensible role in fostering leadership capacity in every individual.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-04-04 thanh1927540 89 view
2022-07-08 nhattram39 78 view
2022-03-01 akorn99 61 view
2022-01-26 sonnn 95 view
2022-01-08 Nguyễn Xuân Sơn 84 view
Essays by user thanh1927540 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1005, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this exposure' or 'these exposures'?
Suggestion: this exposure; these exposures
...ertive a person they will become, since these exposure can hone their headship skills. Such in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a matter of fact, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 380.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67368421053 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35658281582 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631578947368 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6318951357 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1428571429 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184410609509 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532879686787 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499407280153 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106543198362 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0509119367957 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.0946893788 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 50.2224549098 54% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.