Some argue that patriotism is the primary cause of wars globally. Others feel that it serves to prevent less ethical politicians from running a country and starting wars. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people debate that a citizen who thrives an intense nationalism can preclude him from developing unscrupulous behaviour in governance structure and from setting off battles, while others feel that it provokes global armed conflicts. There are arguments on both sides which we will discuss here.
On the one side, objectors of loyalty-induced wars argue that the majority of patriots have great capability of leading a country to a achieve self-reliance. New Zealand, for instance, has transparency income system of parliament to its citizen, followed by Canada and Singapore at a similar policy. Therefore, they can comprehend law and court proceedings so as to hinder them from corruption scandal or money laundry. Furthermore, endless love of one’s nation most likely builds alliance both authority officials and societies to peacefully overcome any problems by discussing together without hardness. It is undoubtedly that image management and social astuteness of leader could cope with the serious problem.
On the flip side, exponents of political chauvinism claim that some parties who show intolerance to any other countries inflict world wars. To illustrate, the high political tensions during Russia-Ukraine war bring Russia to deploy full-scale invasion, because of Ukraine’s stance against the annexation of Crimea Peninsula, and thus engulfing massive victims. In addition, the strength of military units could be brainwashed to notch up political propaganda. The latest riot in France concerned on the death of North African teenager addressing racial discrimination among native European and the rioters. Consequently, this will not only damage public amenities, but also traumatise citizen.
In conclusion, extreme nationalism can substantially spark political disputes among countries including to prejudice against other nations and to exacerbate social conflicts. This is as long as the supreme leader can guarantee the national welfare.
- The bar chart shows the percentage of small medium large companies which used social media for business purposes between 2012 to 2016 90
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones for communication has a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Do you agree or disagree 89
- The table shows the export values of various products in 2009 and 2010
- More and more people want to own items such as cars clothing and other things that are made by famous brands Do you think it is a positive or negative development 80
- The diagram shows how chocolate is produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...reat capability of leading a country to a achieve self-reliance. New Zealand, for...
^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...reat capability of leading a country to a achieve self-reliance. New Zealand, for instanc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...an comprehend law and court proceedings so as to hinder them from corruption scandal or ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uvinism claim that some parties who show intolerance to any other countries infli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06822152935 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.727586206897 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1931616128 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148079850924 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398149231042 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442498586836 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824706090171 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041335536999 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...reat capability of leading a country to a achieve self-reliance. New Zealand, for...
^
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...reat capability of leading a country to a achieve self-reliance. New Zealand, for instanc...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...an comprehend law and court proceedings so as to hinder them from corruption scandal or ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uvinism claim that some parties who show intolerance to any other countries infli...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, so, therefore, thus, while, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80689655172 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06822152935 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.727586206897 0.561755894193 130% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.1931616128 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.285714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148079850924 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398149231042 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442498586836 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824706090171 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041335536999 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.0 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.