Some business observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to like interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues. What could be reason for this? What solution can help address this problem?
Interpersonal skills breakthrough communication gap. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, newly graduated employees have lack of interpersonal skills or not? In the upcoming piece of essay, I will explore its reasons and give some relevant measures for the given topic.
The first step to understand that, why new employees do not get involved with their colleagues rapidly? The prominent reason is self centred employees. As interpersonal skills are really important for an employee for the stability of their mind. Similarly, communication is also an significant factor which should be considered by employees, but there are some which do not make efforts from there side to talk at first with other employees which can be a problem. As every business must need coordination and cooperation between the employees and that is not possible without communication. Moreover, a business can face a lot of difficult situation just because of this mismanagement. A solution can be that, company in which they all are working should throw an orientation party for interaction among the new and earlier employees for better outcome.
The second foremost reason is conflicts among employees. This is a major reason for lack of communication because everyone have their own nature and sometimes, they judge people incorrectly that might lead to argument or misunderstandings between the colleagues. Hence, it is significant for the employees to make good interaction to others to run the management on a progressive track. A measure to deny these issues can be, that company could take initiative and give different team works to their employees which will be either for better understanding or communication.
In conclusion, I would like to say that, as we all know that, a business can not run without efforts from employees, thus if every individual will be down to earth and have a positive spirit towards others than it will neither harm the company nor the employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-06 | Rajan khehra | 54 | view |
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantage 66
- The Pie Charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Some business observe that new employees who just graduated from a college or university seem to like interpersonal skills needed for communication with their colleagues What could be reason for this What solution can help address this problem 54
- In some countries, it is illegal for an employer to reject job applications on the basis of age criteria. Is it a positive or negative development? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience. 67
- International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded? What are its causes and measures can be taken to solve this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 15, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'skills'' or 'skill's'?
Suggestion: skills'; skill's
Interpersonal skills breakthrough communication gap. One of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... mind. Similarly, communication is also an significant factor which should be cons...
^^
Line 5, column 510, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... different team works to their employees which will be either for better understa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, really, second, similarly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2625 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10503623167 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553125 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0050177181 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.266666667 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.350367363355 0.244688304435 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111826389898 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500021898136 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194744521163 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902636262169 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.