International travel makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded? What are its causes and measures can be taken to solve this problem?
'Different countries have acquired different lifestyles'. One of the most controversial issue today relates to that, people are becoming prejudiced rather than open minded from International touring. In this essay, I will examine some of the possible reasons for this trend and suggest some practical measures that an authority could implement to reduce this issue.
The first step to understand that why people are becoming prejudiced after visiting different countries? Broadly speaking, there are types of people in different countries, and they have their own customs. However, tourist is not able to adapt all the traditions and culture of the place they visit. For instance, most of the people from Asian countries do not like to visit in Arab countries due to the different environment and strict culture. The solution for this phenomenon can be that, people should research and gain proper knowledge about the place where they are visiting and then choose whether to go or not.
Another reason that why people do not like places after visiting is due to the behaviour, language and lifestyle of the people living there. In addition, every person have their own way of speaking. However, in every country there is a different way of speaking their own language and tourist might not understand their way of speaking and take it offensive. Although, one option has to be there of a tourist agency which will help people on international level, and take them aware of each and everything of the destination where they are going to visit.
I pen down saying that, this issue could probably be solved by, making people aware about the lifestyle of different countries. So, when they visit there they have face no problem and then they choose wisely where to go.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-06 | Anmol Jindal | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-29 | Rajan khehra | 73 | view |
- The given tabular chart reveals the information about for different secondary schools attended by pupils in what proportion among the years 2000, 2005, and 2009. 89
- Some people give that competitive sports are good for bringing together different people and cultures. Others argue that these sports can cause problems and can increase conflicts between the nations. Discuss both point of view and give your opinion. 73
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female Academic Staff members across the faculties of major University in 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor people, while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial, however, most make no effort to do so. Why do you think this is happening? What are some simple actions that could help the environment. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 229, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... touring. In this essay, I will examine some of the possible reasons for this trend and sug...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'faced'.
Suggestion: faced
...es. So, when they visit there they have face no problem and then they choose wisely ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, then, as to, broadly speaking, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04778156997 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56118729675 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515358361775 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0512372729 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.642857143 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191411845989 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648382272382 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601561504286 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123026692766 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460158104031 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.