Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children?
History plays a vital role in providing young people with necessary information regarding their country, culture, evolution of human civilization and many more. Yet, majority of the children in school find it tedious to learn history. Hence, a change in teaching methodology has to be done to revitalise the interest in children about history. The following passages will evaluate some of the ideas regarding effective teaching techniques.
Firstly, we all know that, children love to watch cartoon. Thus, we can provide them cartoons based on historical events and facts. In this way, children can both learn history and have fun simultaneously. Not only that, children can be introduced to story books, containing graphical characters from the history. Even, fun home works based on this story books can also boost the enthusiasm in learning history.
Secondly, group activities will also be an effective way of teaching children history. For example, organizing small plays with children based on a historical events can help them learn history indirectly. In addition to that, frequent study tours will provide these children a more direct way of learning history without even knowing it.
In conclusion, there is no doubt about the significance of teaching history to the children. but to make it more enjoyable for future prospects of the nation, some changes has to the introduced in the teaching methodology. Unfortunately, there is no single solution to this problem. But, a combination informational cartoons, historical story books and plays and study tours can offer children with effective access to historical information.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-24 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-23 | ashiqulalamkhan | 67 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph blow shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
- In some countries older people are being encouraged to work longer and not to retire. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working beyond retirement age. 73
- More and more students are choosing to study at colleges and universities in a foreign country. Do the benefits of studying abroad outweigh the drawbacks? 78
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting, but many others think it is very boring. In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 382, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...y. The following passages will evaluate some of the ideas regarding effective teaching tech...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 160, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'event'?
Suggestion: event
...ays with children based on a historical events can help them learn history indirectly....
^^^^^^
Line 15, column 95, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...e of teaching history to the children. but to make it more enjoyable for future pr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1400.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49019607843 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90879957298 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552941176471 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.9674728546 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.5 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9375 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294542607924 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102737512458 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0695878751185 0.0667982634062 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186040319145 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409572169293 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.