some cities do not restrict on how stylish and unique houses and offices that people construct can be. do the advantages outweight the disadvantages
In recent years, there has been a growing debate whether the government should limit the kind of buildings allowed to be built or not. While the idea that people can erect any styles of houses they want seems to be reasonable, there is ample evidence that suggests the opposite. I partially agree with the latter view and in this essay, both sides of the argument will be discussed.
On one hand, various kinds of buildings in a city will create a distinctive urban landscape. In other words, its beauty can attract visitors from other places. For example, Ha Noi is a beautiful city with a wide range of houses styles from traditional to modern so it had attracted many guests to come and visit. Furthermore, constructing a house needs the effort of many construction workers and house designers, that is to say, the more special the customed-house is, the more jobs and employees will be needed; thanks to that, unemployment could be reduced to some extent.
On the other hand, a street with all kinds of dwellings might look like a mess. Due to the permission of the government, the city may lose its earnest view. For instance, imagine seeing an ancient temple or church seated next to a circus or bars will reduce its formality. In addition, the citizen’s unique style might be dangerous for the neighborhood. To illustrate this point, in 1980 there was a man who built his houses looking like an upside-down pyramid and two months later the building fell down and caused the death of five people.
In conclusion, I have discussed both sides of the argument and given my opinions. Although the uncommon house styles may rise the outlook of the city and reduce unemployment, I still believe that the disadvantages outweigh the advantages because of the danger and chaos it might cause.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-12 | johntoanpro | 89 | view |
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 84
- Some people think that the government is responsible for looking after the elderly Others believe that it is the role of individuals Who do you think should take responsibility for 56
- One of the best ways to solve environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- some cities do not restrict on how stylish and unique houses and offices that people construct can be do the advantages outweight the disadvantages 89
- With the development of the media online there is no future for the radio To what extent do you agree 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, may, so, still, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, in other words, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82200647249 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70162773711 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601941747573 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5764320186 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.428571429 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7857142857 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185842110572 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534531977681 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501057763193 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10463539376 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382199177981 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.