Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes, instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development?
Nowadays, international sports games become a playing field for national sports industry to showcase the best personal talents and bring home honor and admiration. Some countries are willing to provide specialized facilities to train athletes skill, instead of fitness facilities for public use. While I personally think this is a positive development, it also has some drawbacks.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why the government pumps the huge amount of money into a select and upgrade specialized sports facilities to serve for training professional skills. First reason is that expenditure on training athletes team for abroad coaching could be reduced significantly, thanks to the budget of the nation. For example, Japan has long been known for its gold medal football team in Olympic due to their appropriate method of training and tremendous investment in infrastructures. Another reason is that sufficient sports infrastructures have a positive impact on youngsters who are more likely to pursue sports professions. Therefore, this will result in potential human resources who make a great contribution to national sports industry in many years.
On the other hand, extremely focusing on investing the quality of sports equipment has a negative influence on social problems. Firstly, training sectors accounted for the large space of society as well as wasting the enormous cost of capital. Consequently, people will have fewer places to go for exercises and play their favorite sports such as swimming or badminton and make national economic to be fall. Secondly, the lack of public sports facilities may unfortunately increase chances of people leading a sedentary lifestyle which is a major factor in health problems such as obesity, diabetes and heart diseases. For instance, because young people have to use few and old public facilities that it could not cater for their demand so they tend to spend time playing games or chatting with other people. As a result, they have to suffer from eyes and the risk of mental disorder.
In conclusion, although the building of specialized training centers for top athletes brings some benefit for sport national industry in some ways, it seems to me it has disadvantages problems for society. It is suggested that a balancing act is required from the authorities to minimize the potential drawbacks of the issue.
- Some countries achieve international sports by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Do you think this is positive or negative development 61
- Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed Discuss both views and give your opinion 90
- Today more and more people are using mobile phones and computers. Thus, people are losing the ability to communicate face to face. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that the government should invest in teaching science rather than in other subjects for a country development and progress What extent do you agree or disagree 85
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both these views 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2012.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 378.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32275132275 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9186453234 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584656084656 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8279457994 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8125 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275858187347 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0903569990998 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0815928427127 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188932796579 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0953951042975 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.