Some countries achieve international sports success by building specialized facilities to train top athelets instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Do you think this is positive or negative development.
Today there some countries in the world that gaining international sport medals because they support athletes by specialized facilities, and these facilities not allowed for public. In my opinion, this is negative development which can lead citizens’ resistance and some healthy issues.
One serious problem that can arise in public resistance, because some people accept this as discrimination. If government spend huge amount of money for building some facilities for only personals, public people limited the opportunity as a result, these limited people feel degraded. As a result of this, some athletes feel that they more important and necessary to country. It may cause some big problems to government and all public.
Another issue is that, spending much money to only individuals can be risky. In international competitions only strongest athletes can win. In other words, if these individuals could not win the medals, it means country waste public budget. Furthermore, government should use resources for everyone and facilities should share equally. So human rights will be properly exercised.
Finally, individualizing the facilities can end difficulties years later as medals and authority gives nothing to ordinary citizen. This situation is critical for teenagers who need more sport facilities for doing some exercises and to be healthy. In addition government should think population health and school children opportunities to training in order to think only individuals.
In conclusion, although it has a lot of profit from making international medals, it has brought about too many problems for this to be considered a positive trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-05 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 20 and future projections for 2025 20 for test purposes use and refer to the current year 61
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in differnt countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisos where relevant
- Music is played in every society and culture in the world today Some people think that music brings only benefits to individuals and societies Others however think that music can have a negative influence on both Discuss both views and give your own opini
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people fro using their cars 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...an rights will be properly exercised Finally individualizing the facilities can end ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...lities can end difficulties years later as medals and authority gives nothing to o...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, furthermore, if, may, so, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1386.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93232153499 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 253.0 20.2975951904 1246% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1386.0 106.682146367 1299% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 253.0 20.7667163134 1218% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 105.0 7.06120827912 1487% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28568806264 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.28568806264 0.084324248473 339% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161785465499 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0840261471957 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 130.9 13.0946893788 1000% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -193.78 50.2224549098 -386% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 103.1 11.3001002004 912% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 15.98 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 19.87 8.58950901804 231% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 60.0 9.78957915832 613% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 103.2 10.1190380762 1020% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 60.0 10.7795591182 557% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.