Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
In recent years, some countries have chosen to build specialized facilities to train top athletes rather than providing sports facilities that everyone can use. While this development can be seen as both positive and negative, I believe that the benefits of building specialized facilities outweigh the drawbacks.
On the positive side, building specialized facilities can help a country develop top athletes and improve its performance in international competitions. By providing athletes with state-of-the-art equipment and training facilities, countries can create a competitive advantage and attract talented athletes from around the world. For example, the United States Olympic Training Center in Colorado Springs has been instrumental in producing Olympic champions and improving the country's overall performance in the Games.
However, building specialized facilities can also be a negative development. By focusing on elite athletes, countries may neglect the development of sports facilities for the general public. This can create an exclusive environment where only a select few have access to high-quality sports facilities. For instance, in Qatar, the government has invested heavily in building world-class facilities for international sporting events, but the general public still lacks adequate sports facilities.
On the other hand, some argue that providing sports facilities for everyone is more important than building specialized facilities. They believe that access to sports facilities is a fundamental right that should be available to everyone, regardless of their athletic abilities. In countries like Sweden, where sports are heavily subsidized by the government, everyone has access to quality sports facilities and programs, which promotes a healthier and more active lifestyle.
In conclusion, while building specialized facilities can be a double-edged sword, I believe that the benefits of developing top athletes and improving international performance outweigh the negatives of exclusive access. However, it is important for governments to also invest in providing sports facilities for the general public to promote a healthier and more active society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- The map below shows the changes that have taken palce at the waterfront area of a town calles Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- Many employers are now offering their employees the option to work from home As a result employees will have more flexible hours in the future Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 67
- The map below shows the development of a seaside village between 1995 and present Write a short report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...evelopment of sports facilities for the general public. This can create an exclusive environme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 441, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... international sporting events, but the general public still lacks adequate sports facilities....
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... in providing sports facilities for the general public to promote a healthier and more active ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.01916932907 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17733838018 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495207667732 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3524990285 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.571428571 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538306453636 0.244688304435 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216079457477 0.084324248473 256% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134282604196 0.0667982634062 201% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.343300375746 0.151304729494 227% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102219096051 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 12.4159519038 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.7795591182 167% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.