Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use. Is it a positive or negative development?
In modern civilisation, there is a fact that several nations construct specific buildings to master elite athletes’ skills rather than give public sports facilities’ provisions. From my perspective, I concur that this phenomenon could result in both beneficial and detrimental effects.
It is undeniable that governments could set up infrastructure specialisation for skilled trainees. That is because their potential can be maximised through those facilities so that they could acquire desirable achievements in international competitions. For instance, in Vietnam, national football stadiums have been built like Ba Dinh for professional guidance to players to discover their best abilities and alleviate weaknesses. From these stadiums, iconic footballers have been created, such as Hung Dung, Tien Linh, etc.
On the other hand, this propensity could trigger numerous drawbacks. Firstly, a budget concentration on sports’ special constructions to train sports stars would lead to a shortage in financial expenditure on community sports facilities. When this trend continues, citizens could not have access to open sports areas, which results in a sedentary lifestyle with deteriorating health conditions. Furthermore, a scarcity of public sports accommodation could also awaken people’s innate possibilities related to sports. Citizens would have difficulties searching for sports infrastructure; thus, they may not find proper sites to practise their sports skills. Thus, talents who could achieve notable advances in sports might not be discovered, and that would be a serious loss for the country.
In conclusion, while there are some upsides of building specific land for top athletes, I hold a firm belief that it could result in many downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | honguyenlily | 84 | view |
| 2023-11-06 | thaokim2003 | 61 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-03 | Cuberates | 73 | view |
- In recent years there is a trend of responsible tourism which pays attention to both local culture and the environment However there are still people who think that responsible tourism is impossible to implement in reality To what extent do you agree or d 77
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people believe that children that commit crimes should be punished Others think the parents should be punished instead Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Some countries achieve international success by building specialized facilities to train top athletes instead of providing sports facilities that everyone can use Is it a positive or negative development 89
- In some countries schools are teaching English to primary school children Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 150, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that it could result in many downsides.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88372093023 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21201622884 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697674418605 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5594500311 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.769230769 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155063613053 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504512912153 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544048858317 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0888773307915 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01611638469 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.