Some countries are struggling with an increase in crime rates. Many people think that having more police on the streets is the only way to reduce crime. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Many people seem to think that increasing police patrols is the only way to prevent crime. Personally, I disagree with this viewpoint and believe that, in addition to the frequent presence of the police force, there are also other methods that may be used to tackle the issue of high crime rates.
Regular inspections of the streets by agents of law enforcement will obviously function as a deterrent, decreasing the rate of criminal offenses. If criminals or predators see police patrolling in public places at all hours of the day and night, they are more likely to refrain from committing crimes out of fear of being apprehended by the police when they are essential or incapacitated . As a result, the crime rate will fall dramatically. This anti-crime strategy is most effective in preventing crimes that occur frequently in public settings, such as theft, vandalism, robbery, or burglary.
On the other hand, I believe that crime prevention can be advocated in a variety of ways that do not entail expanding the number of police officers. First, showing criminal trials by law courts to the public on television helps inhibit criminal intent. By viewing the trials on television, viewers will become more mindful of the severe punishments inflicted on their criminal activities. As a result, people with terrible intentions will abandon their criminal plans. Second, expanding the use of cameras in public locations is a helpful tool for crime prevention and deterrence. This is due to the fact that offenders are less inclined to behave in situations where they nare aware they are being observed. Furthermore, if a crime is committed, law enforcement can use video evidence to apprehend and prosecute the perpetrator.
In conclusion, while additional police officers on the streets can help reduce crime, I believe other anti-crime strategies, such as trial television, should also be used. More crime and camera surveillance in public locations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | gianggiangvn | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-19 | daidang869 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Koi | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | cleee | 73 | view |
- Some old customs and traditions are not useful presently so should be given up To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Due to the development and rapid expansion of supermarkets in some countries many small local business are unable to compete Some people think that the closure of local business will bring about the death of local communities To what extent do you agree o 56
- Do the advantages of private means of transportation such as cars and motorbikes outweigh the disadvantages compared to public transport trains buses and taxis Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experience 56
- Nowadays it is common for people to get married and have children in their thirties rather than when they are younger Do you agree or disagree that this trend will benefit society 73
- Although families have influence on a children s development factors outside the home play a bigger part in their lives nowadays To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ALSO_OTHER[1]
Message: Use simply 'there are other' or 'there are also'
Suggestion: there are other; there are also
... frequent presence of the police force, there are also other methods that may be used to tackle the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...when they are essential or incapacitated . As a result, the crime rate will fall d...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1644.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21904761905 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89044472804 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568253968254 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.7672685453 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.6 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.06666666667 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280274052204 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100537027022 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773638331212 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195051821324 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675077752699 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.