Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates. Some believe that having mire police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crimes.
To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is often argued that today, criminality is escalating in some countries. Some suggest that setting numerous law enforcement agents up on the street corners is a major key of reduction and endurance of criminalizing. I completely disagree with this statement because this approach cannot be a proper solution to the situation instead of it, the governments should investigate the main reasons causing enormous crime waves.
Firstly, it is an indisputable fact that committing a crime occurs whenever people in society have strong desperation for satisfying their needs in their life time. I think all the issues are interconnected with widespread unemployment or a job with a low salary and also lacking education systems
Taking Afghanistan as an example, it's population nearly are educated, and it is extremely desperate that even women are not allowed to go to schools and have particular knowledge they wanted. As a consequence of lacking of skills and diplomas, most are straggling with finding a job in order to increase their low budget.
And I personally believe that the matters are main causes leading to commit various types of crime such as robbery, burglary, and shoplifting.
Secondly, it is vitally important to note that the authority should create a governmental charity to support people who are living in poverty additionally the society ought to arrange a particular committee which deal with severe problems different groups of people have preventing from criminalities rather than establishing police force groups.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that having more law enforcement groups is not a solution to decline crime rates in some nations instead of this, the states should find another ways such as launching some special communities to combat crime.
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past decades Although some of these changes have been negative the overall effect of this technology has been positive 61
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in 5 Australian cities 84
- The bar chart illustrates the statistics of different aged people who donated money to charity during 1990 and 2010 in UK 84
- Task 2 In many countries it is acceptable that governments spend money on religious holidays such as New Year To what extent do you agree and disagree with this 73
- The figures illustrate the statistics about usage of water in Oceania in the year of 2004 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: LIFE_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lifetime'?
Suggestion: lifetime
...ion for satisfying their needs in their life time. I think all the issues are interconnec...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... think all the issues are interconnected with widespread unemployment or a job wi...
^^
Line 4, column 310, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...finding a job in order to increase their low budget. And I personally believe th...
^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ortant to note that the authority should create a governmental charity to support...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35087719298 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99311614024 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635087719298 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 87.8189776729 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.444444444 106.682146367 159% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6666666667 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.77777777778 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242399296686 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866407747712 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055787803343 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10799124443 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664297983752 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.6 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.55 50.2224549098 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.