In few nations, senior political leaders are making a lesser amount of money than celebrities. I am of the firm opinion that this is very bad for the society and it is going to do more harm than benefit.The following paragraphs will discuss the main cause for this.
One of the main causes for the stark difference in earnings is that celebrities are more popular than politicians.For instance, whenever I switch on my television there are more chances of me seeing a celebrity on a channel than a politician. A consequence of this is that advertising agencies approach celebrities more which results in them making fortunes. In contrast, politicians do none or very few advertisements. A major reason for this is that politicians are generally not allowed to do advertisements by the law.
Another factor that contributes to the lesser earning of political representatives is their personal goals. Normally, politicians work for the socio-economic development of the society rather than their own personal gain. For example, from time to time politicians have used their own personal funds for the development of the country. The polar opposite to that is the celebrities whose main aim may be to earn a lot of money.
Overall, the personal goal and the law of the country results in politicians making less income than celebrities. I remain of the opinion that this is regression for the society because if only the politicians earned more money than the celebrities this would have influenced the youth to do social work and join politics.
- In some countries celebrities earn higher salaries than senior politicians What are the reasons Is it a negative or positive development 56
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...t is going to do more harm than benefit.The following paragraphs will discuss the m...
^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: For
...ities are more popular than politicians.For instance, whenever I switch on my telev...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1296.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10111969446 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51953125 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.220071242 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3333333333 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216913510189 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865303962474 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399024161005 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138679972883 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0423040532096 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.