In some countries in Europe, some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job. Other children stay in schools which provide a more general academic education. What should schools do to prepare students for the world of work?
Since globalization started to have beneficial impact on the developments of countries’ economy all over the world, job market have become more competitive and more challenging. That has made the majority of parents worried about how much chance their children will have to get a good job in the future. So, in some European countries, most of the children aged 11 and 13 are advised to take part in vocational courses for being employed easily. However, other children are supported in pursing higher education. In this way, both above-mentioned attitudes will be discussed clearly together with solutions that schools should take.
There is no denying that helping children make decision about pursing vocational training courses at the age of 11 or 13 can improve the quality of education effectively. The reason for this statement is that at those ages, some students have a tendency to find academic courses increasingly dreary. Instead, taking part in practical activities bring them vividly exciting experiences and thus, to a certain extent, they can fulfill occupational tasks better than studying highly theoretical knowledge. More than that, they can study useful skills from practice.
On the other hand, other children may have strong interest in building a solid foundation of academic knowledge for pursing higher education. In particular, some students own the special ability of understanding highly specialized and theoretical knowledge. That always make them more inquisitive about new academic theories. Actually, that kind of students can be employed as a key force of research and development centers where they can satisfy the interest in researching and broadening their horizons.
To ensure both types of students to be well-educated, the authorities of schools should plan efficient strategies for their comprehensive development. Firstly, when children come to a proper age, they need to be asked about their future desire. Then, teachers should create an appropriate environment like vocational guiding extracurricular activities for those with interest in learning practical skills and small-scale research projects for those with desire for broadening academic knowledge. In addition, they should have high responsibility for reducing the burden of high marks and achievements on children of those ages. Owing to that solution, students must not feel being isolated from their school environment.
To sum up, the mission of educating efficiently children at the age of 11 or 13 has never been simple. To gain the best results, schools themselves must put their thoughts into heading their students towards a bright future in job market instead of evaluating them through meaningless marks as the traditional way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-10-23 | oprah86 | 84 | view |
| 2020-10-19 | LE ANH HUY | 73 | view |
- Film were produced by big companies in the past but today people are able to make a film Do you think this trend is positive or negative 78
- Some people think that the increasing use of computers and mobile phones has negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills To what extent do you agree or disagree with this 73
- Beside a lot of advantages some people believe that the Internet creates many problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university 84
- It is true that in some countries grandparents play a significant role in bringing up children This trend has both positive and negative sides Let s look at the positive side first 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, may, so, then, thus, well, in addition, in particular, kind of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2329.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 422.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51895734597 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98633956277 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556872037915 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8171406245 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.45 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 8.67935871743 207% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289624924154 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.08447060284 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0355729549054 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159966199758 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487331571148 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.