In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country , while others believe government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In recent nations, only a few persons can earn high salaries compared to others with lower income. One school of thought argues that there should be a maximum earnings limit on numerous high earners, while others believe that earning a high salary has a good impact on the country. From my point of view, I opine that the advantages of this tendency outweigh its adverse, whereas we can not deny the drawbacks of this trend.
On the one hand, there are various compelling reasons explaining why some people think that it is necessary to put a limitation on people with high salaries. As it can be a great method to bridge social inequality between the highest and lowest earners in the prompted ways, therefore, we can dispense with the income disparity. Following this phenomenon, a vast majority of firms can cut a huge budget spent on excutive’s salaries, and thus those companies have more chances to allot to other crucial aspects, such as the energy field receiving lots of revenues, for instance. Many experts have said that countries with the smallest level of income gap often have lower crime and underprivileged rates compared to those with the increase in economic disparity.
Notwithstanding the aforementioned arguments; however, I believe that if a maximum earnings legislation was approved, there would be a bad effect later on the society. Setting a limit on the number of salaries that skilled workers earned, who dedicated themselves to the development of companies in economic fields, to work or leave in other countries or move to distinct firms with great remuneration. The brain drain will have an adverse effect on the stability of economies and companies due to the absence of skilled workers, and as a result, the economy can be demolished. Moreover, it is hard for the economy to thrive while well-educated workforces and skilled workers are willing to use their contribution to other countries where they can secure a high-paid job instead of working with poor remuneration.
In conclusion, despite the benefits of putting a limitation on salaries, I strongly believe that the government should not set a limit on the wage of highest earners due to the huge impact on the growth of the economy and business.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-11 | Desi Sari Ayuni | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-02 | khoapham | 78 | view |
- Many people nowadays have more than one job at the same time What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 78
- The internet has transformed lives and economies but it is turning the world into a global village Soon everybody will think and behave in the same way To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 61
- Many people nowadays have more than one job at the same time What are the reasons Is it a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not deny the drawbacks of this trend. On the one hand, there are various compe...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th the increase in economic disparity. Notwithstanding the aforementioned argum...
^^^
Line 5, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'earnings'' or 'earning's'?
Suggestion: earnings'; earning's
...s; however, I believe that if a maximum earnings legislation was approved, there would b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead of working with poor remuneration. In conclusion, despite the benefits of p...
^^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...ment should not set a limit on the wage of highest earners due to the huge impact on the g...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04021447721 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84683911603 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544235924933 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.9401230397 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.666666667 106.682146367 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0833333333 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306215188752 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103899882902 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0786103823001 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166301258416 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784191686623 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 50.2224549098 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.