In some countries, it is illegal to reject people applying for jobs because of their ages. Is it a positive or negative development?
In many nations, firms are prohibited to take age into consideration when they recruit new employees. While I consent its implication to social betterment, I opine that this regulation also have drawbacks.
On the one hand, abolishing age restriction in job application is acknowledged to be an advantageous tendency thanks to several reasons. Regarding the community, many governments are endeavoring to establish an egalitarian society, and the assuring equality of opportunities always stands out as the most essential mission. Hence, adopting a policy which provides all citizens with equal access to recruitment, the authority is able to take a big step to achieve such objective. In addition, regarding the economy, obviating age limit is expected to facilitate a phenomenal growth. Indeed, if candidates of all ages are allowed to approach every vacancy, companies will obviously have more options for a certain jobs; as a result, they are more likely to recruit competent employees, who can upgrade labor productivity and maximize their profits.
On the other hand, it is safe to say that the aforementioned regulation raises concerns over public health. Particularly, since adopting premature or retired labors is no longer illegal, enterprises may exploit and force them to toil in working environment with poor hygiene and safety standard, which is detrimental to health and leave them exhausted. For example, when Nigeria policy makers announced that child labors can work in mining industry, a massive number of young adults became blue-collar workers in industrial zones and that subsequently increased the incidence of asthma among children by 20%. In fact, it is citizens themselves who have the right to choose how they treat their bodies, no matter how enormously it will affect their life quality. However, not only do such consequences negatively impact workers’ fitness, but they also create financial burden on families and cripple healthcare system; in other words, even if the policy is ratified to improve social state, the medical externality yielded can make it counter-productive.
Briefly, it seems to me that besides its discernible benefits, making jobs accessible to all age group also create many obstacles.
- The table show the average salaries of graduates and non graduates in the UK in 2010 Summarise information by selecting and reporting main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since there is computer technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Organized tours to remote places and communities is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 89
- Some people think that it s good for a country s culture if people watch some imported film or TV programs while some people argue that it could be better if people watch films of their own culture Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The information below gives details about the household income and spending on food and clothes by an avarage family in a UK city in 2010 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l age group also create many obstacles.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49567723343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0716973487 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665706051873 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8400900144 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.692307692 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994503063235 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316122722587 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294216652062 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057879194709 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220251230894 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l age group also create many obstacles.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, while, for example, in addition, in fact, as a result, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1907.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49567723343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0716973487 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665706051873 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.8400900144 49.4020404114 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.692307692 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6923076923 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0769230769 7.06120827912 171% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0994503063235 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0316122722587 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294216652062 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.057879194709 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220251230894 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.