Some people think that it's good for a country's culture if people watch some imported film or TV programs while some people argue that it could be better if people watch films of their own culture.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been a difference of opinion regarding the merits of foreign movies and TV channels as some people believe that the preference for domestic products would be an incentive for a nation’s cultural development. Although imported entertaining programs can be beneficial, I opine that domestic films and TV shows offer more advantages.
On the one hand, a diversity of foreign films and TV telecasts can contribute to the cultural enhancement of a nation. To begin with, the programs have been recognised to play an important role in promoting local performing arts. Indeed, in telecasts produced by developed entertaining industries, it is the accomplished artists and the dazzling display of their talents that become role models for domestic professions, thanks to which they can upgrade their competencies. Moreover, an exposure to foreign programs, which reflect oversea cultural identity, can result in an adaptation to positive customs and beliefs. In Vietnam, for example, since the arrival of TV shows from more developed nations, which triggers a new and civilised way of thinking, such depraved practices at traditional festivals as killing animals or gambling have been gradually aborted.
On the other hand, I believe that supporting local movies and TV shows leads to more substantial benefits. Regarding to education, obviously, profound insights of traditional values can be vividly conveyed in cinemas and on the media if the content and messages are largely initiated by local playwrights. Therefore, domestic programs offer an alternative to monotonous casual classes, through which institutions can address concerns about an attractive transmission of history knowledge. Regarding to culture, besides advantageous contents, exotic practices also inevitably contain inappropriate details due to custom difference, so an unselective assimilation might lead to the oblivion of long-standing ethics. Hence, this increasingly highlights the importance of an approach solely involving domestic products, which can tackle worries about any detriment to native traditions and beliefs.
Briefly, while not disavowing the significance of international movies and TV shows, it seems to me that they cannot surpass that of local-made programs.
- In today s world private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages 89
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Art is considered an essential part of all cultures throughout the world However these days fewer and fewer people appreciate art and turn their focus to science technology and business Why do you think that is What could be done to encourage more people 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end poverty and hunger Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and must be stopped Discuss both view and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 865, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r gambling have been gradually aborted. On the other hand, I believe that suppor...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, briefly, but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77611940299 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1525186443 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608955223881 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 595.8 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.6235387514 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.846153846 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144258748566 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524368677536 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617489536466 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100543936925 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0942870043472 0.056905535591 166% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.