In some countries it is thought advisable that children begin formal education at four years old, while in others they do not have to start school until they are seven or eight. How far do you agree with either of these views?
In some countries, children begin going to school at the age of four. Parallel, a number of people argue that there is no need for children to start academic education until they are seven or eight. From my perspective, children should get appropriate knowledge which is suitable for their age.
First and foremost, allowing children to go to school as they get older assists them in acquiring knowledge more effectively due to their development in both physical and mental aspects. Due to the fact at the age of seven or eight, children experience a period of growing in strength as well as mentality. As a consequence, this period will facilitate their way of perceiving information in an academic environment. The obstacles when adapting to a completely different environment will be somehow removed.
However, I consider that children at the age of four are already learning about basic knowledge, which is enough for their thinking ability. According to many scientists, those aged three or four are highly advised to start school early owing to their willingness to explore a new world. This prior learning will prepare them to face the higher material in the next level of education. So, receiving such basic material at a young age is essential to support student's learning process in some years ahead
To summarize, I believe that we should let children go to school when they are seven or eight to ensure that their brain is mature enough to receive complex information. However, I believe that starting their learning process at a younger age will support their learning process in the next period of their school.
- In many countries today people buy a range of household goods television microwave oven and rice cookers Is it a positive or negative development 11
- The charts show the sources of electricity produced in 4 countries between 2003 and 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagrams illustrate the process of building an igloo 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1362.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0258302583 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74968417487 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538745387454 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4862345291 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193481478238 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815879298275 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.073010116005 0.0667982634062 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13441035785 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574458550503 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.