In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested about finding out the history of the house or the building the live in.
Why is this the case? How can people research this?
In many nations, it has become increasingly common for individuals to develop an interest in uncovering the history of their residence. In my opinion, this aids the renovation and restoration process, and the primary methods often involve the help of architectural experts and local councils.
Admittedly, researching the history of their houses allows occupants to reinforce and maintain the structure effectively. This is because many antique buildings were erected decades or centuries ago, implying that unless the dwellers are descendants or relatives of the original proprietors, they might have very little insight into the structural elements and related matters to the construction. Such internal aspects, while usually neglected, are vital as they differ from era to era and may no longer satisfy the safety regulations of modern buildings. Hence, gathering these priceless pieces of information could allow occupants, especially homeowners, to recalculate the applied loads, accurately perform structural analysis, and reinforce the structure should any defects be detected.
Accordingly, residing inhabitants ought to seek information from licensed contractors or local authorities to compile a building history. By assessing the interior and façade, most architects can discern the core style of the premises; they can then proceed with a more in-depth investigation into the components attached to the property. A more accurate estimation of the age and the construction materials, as a result, would be provided, and plans for reinforcement and renovation later proposed. If costs are of the matter of concern, either county archives or local councils or history societies could be contacted. These government officials and organizations should keep detailed catalogs of municipal information, construction dates and structural alterations.
In conclusion, tracing the history of houses allows people to re-design and make necessary adjustments to the premises if required. Research practices often involve professional services from architectural experts or authorities within the locale, which is a welcome trend that should be encouraged.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-28 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-02 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages out outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some educationalists say every child should be taught to play musical instrument To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The three pictures show the position of a volcano and a village before and after volcanic eruption Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people believe that traditional culture is being damaged as it is used as a tool for making money in the tourism industry Others think it is the only way to protect culture and tradition Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people say that in the modern world getting old is entirely bad Others believe that old people s life nowadays is much better than in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.91054313099 5.12529762239 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18435644334 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642172523962 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2373908087 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.307692308 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154356912285 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0473008137726 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376255778272 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851414544252 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0144807778081 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.58950901804 132% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.