It is thought in certain nations that having a property of one’s own is vital comparing of renting. The reason why for this case is that owning a home can raise an individual’s social status in these countries where population of renting a home are considered losers. Despite potential negative aspects this idea may bring about, I still reckon it as a positive occasion.
In most developing countries and a few developed ones, ownership of home is essential to measure one’s capability in society. Companies and employers would judge a man by his condition of accommodation during a recruitment. They tend to believe one is more reliable with their own house and a permanent address. The same judgement will happen again in the situation a woman considering about marrying to a man, who will hardly be chosen if they are renting a home. Such scenes are happening repeatedly every day in these countries that one can only work hard and save money to get on the property ladder.
Some may argue that no one should be judged by whether they are home owners, and renting is a valuable option for certain population. I would not disagree with the argument, however, ownership of homes can benefit most ordinary people. It is undeniable that renting can bring more flexibility and cost less than mortgaging for homes, especially for young people. Nevertheless, the main difference between renting and buying a house is that, renting is totally consuming while buying is owning. That is to say, in the end of, for example, 30 years of paying monthly for one’s accommodation, renting ends up nothing but buying leaves one a real home.
In conclusion, after discussed the reason why it is crucial to have a house and both ways of accommodation, I believe that one should absolutely own a home rather than rent for their whole life, no matter which country they are in.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 75
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 66
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 50
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie chart shows the percentage of women in poverty and the bar chart shows poverty rates by sex and age They are from the United States in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...o get on the property ladder. Some may argue that no one should be judged by whether...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 483, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...nting is totally consuming while buying is owning. That is to say, in the end of, for exa...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 233, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e, no matter which country they are in.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87460815047 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76156867276 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579937304075 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1276083021 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295623256417 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964600990442 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712705871021 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18082930272 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534861908484 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.