In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development

Essay topics:

In some countries, online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. Do you think it is a positive or negative development?

It is agrued that in some nation, online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. From my point view, this notion have both benefits and drawbacks with each person and each situation. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern innovation that technology is hugely significant for the individual life which online shopping is especial instance. Not only does online shopping very convenience where people just need one click for their requirement, but also numerous valuable equipment can be provided for the development. Furthermore, more occupations and fields will be created by this new technology, increasing the citizen life and social development. To illustrate, there was a survey by Giovanni Schiapperelli, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of citizens in London who improve their finacial though online shopping. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has got a various achevements for their career.
On the other hand, we can not negate the demerits of online shopping for the adolesence. The bad quality production will be provided by terrible seller which do not siminar with their advertisment, and also there are a plenty of poison foods on the online shopping which is really horrible for the people health. Moreover, many government take advantage from this trend for their own profits, harmful influence will be led by this action, reducing their country development.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay this statement have its own benefits and drawbacks appropriate with each person and each occupation, so the state need to have clear plans for the nation improvement.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-19 chino0301 84 view
2024-03-18 nguyendangquang.aspect 84 view
2024-03-10 hoaithuongnguyen283 89 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-03-03 Ahmad_off 61 view
Essays by user hieu13092006 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ued that in some nation, online shopping is replacing shopping in stores. From my...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...will analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...various achevements for their career. On the other hand, we can not negate the...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, reducing their country development. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, first of all, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1452.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33823529412 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8289527419 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584558823529 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7161234616 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172463090201 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0801454112008 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115840194529 0.0667982634062 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10740506434 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703810580831 0.056905535591 124% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.