Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people believe that it is more effective if children start learning a second language at primary school instead of secondary school. I strongly agree with this assertion.
First of all, many research studies have shown that young children learn languages more rapidly and easily than adolescents. If adults create interest in languages for children by using foreign songs, cartoon movies of fairy tales, they will enjoy this language. For example, I have had self- verification from my elder brothers. Nam, the first kid of my uncle’s family follows learning process of his school that started studying English at secondary school and at present time, he cannot really express his ideas in English very well. In comparison, his elder brother loves Walt Disney cartoon series, and began learning English when he was still 6 years old. Now, the elder one can speak fluently and confidently this language like his mother tongue.
In addition, children at adolescent ages usually feel shy to pronounce a new language as they could be taken as a joke from their classmates, while brains of children at primary school are programmed to effectively receive the second language.
Moreover, teenagers need to spend more time on studying many difficult subjects including math, chemistry, physics. This causes a reduction in time spent on learning English. In comparison with adolescents, young children have to only concentrate on two main subjects that are math and literature. Consequently, they have much more time for studying their favorite subjects like English.
To conclude, it is true that learning foreign language in primary school is more effective than in secondary school.
- The graph shows the results of a survey of British public figures that people can recognise from their photographs.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minute 78
- Write about the following topic.It has been noted that many people who had a big impact on the world gave themselves completely to their work and did not bother with the idea of “work-life balance”. To what extent should people try to have a good work 84
- the table below shows the expenditures of four car companies in the UK in 2002. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 84
- In many countries, young people are granted certain privileges and responsibilities at the age of sixteen. Clearly, parents have a responsibility to both care for and prepare their children as they approach this important milestone.To what degree should p 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...n in time spent on learning English. In comparison with adolescents, young children have t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, really, second, so, still, well, while, for example, in addition, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34328358209 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66573598893 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1230761957 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.285714286 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341133321773 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12061833412 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124220066703 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240949630946 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128908974325 0.056905535591 227% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.