Some government spend massive on an individual for an international sport event rathar than public welfare. Do you agree or disagree?
In today’s era, money plays a significant role in the development of any country as well as for improving the living standard of people. However, some people advocate an opinion of spending money on international sports event, rather than for public welfare. Thus, I partially accord with the statement.
To begin with, various countries are evolving at a rapid pace in every realm, and to win in any competition whether it is sports events or other events has become a symbol of any country’s prestige and recognition. Therefore, government should spend monetary fund on an individual on account of certain reasons. Firstly, sport is considered as an important realm, whereby any country can easily establish its competent image in the world, which ensures myriad benefits for any country. Hence, competent players ensure win any sport, and it can be plausible with sufficient funding from the side of government on them. On the top of that, many players cannot afford their training fees and also are not able to arrange necessary resources to become a skilled player, consequently here government can come as a semblance of hope for them. For instance, The United States Of America is a leading champion in sports events owing to its bird eye view on sports player.
However, government cannot ignore another side of its major responsibility because government is for the people, and thereby government should also pay heed towards public welfare due to multifarious reasons. Firstly, living standard of people of any country determines the future of any country, and it is evident that no country can prosperous without public welfare. In addition, if there will be allocation of major portion of budget for public welfare from the side of government then there will transpire more opportunities in terms of jobs, education and so on, for the people, which ultimately make any country developed because any country’s development cannot be judged by merely one factor.
To conclude, I opine that government should pay an equivalent heed on every realm, as every sector contributes equally in making any country developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-06 | kuldeep sharma | 100 | view |
- Some people think that the modern technology is making people more sociable while others think it is making them less sociable Discuss both the views and give your opinion 88
- Some government spend massive on an individual for an international sport event rathar than public welfare. Do you agree or disagree? 100
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective Provide reasons for your answer Include relevant examples from your 84
- With internet improvements, people can share views or opinions on certain goods or services that they have purchased. Is this a good or a bad thing? Discuss both views and give your opinion. 100
- International tourism has become cheaper than before, so more and more countries open their doors to tourists. Do the advantages of increasing tourism outweigh the disadvantages? 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
... importantly, living style of citizens. however, some government spend massive on an in...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 403, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...blic welfare. Therefore, I am partially agree with this statement. In the beginnin...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion, on the basis of which, any countrys development can easily be evaluated, whe...
^^
Line 3, column 287, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'criterion'?
Suggestion: criterion
...ated, wherein, sport considers as a key criteria. For instance, America is an unbeatable...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, therefore, well, for instance, such as, as a result, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 28.0 8.3376753507 336% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54202898551 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17060379398 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588405797101 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3174688053 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.470588235 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11764705882 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292942725573 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962001415751 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160180133008 0.0667982634062 240% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176694689187 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112651943951 0.056905535591 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.