Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open, and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media (TV, newspapers, Internet).
Do you agree with this view, or do you think that in some circumstances governments should limit the freedom of the media?
More and more people are allowed to access to the mass media. Some argue that there are should not any obstackles for obtaining information, also nobody chases the activity of people such as what they are reading, watching and so on through Internet. Should government perform efforts against freedom of society or ignore this risk? I can see both sides of this argument, and in this essay I will give my opinion and some examples.
Generally, people in last centure were as reserved as today. Due to the development of technologies, a plethora of people have access to the newspapers, TV and Internet. The influences to most of them could be not only positive, but also negative. Officials do not let citizens have free access to malicious information. As a result, there is a likelihood that they would be as members of terrorist's groups. Therefore, special agencies could estimate safety in advance.
In contrast, in many countries have been blocked a majority of information source in order to conserve people from absurd idea. However, they could not totally prohibit it, as external hackers tend to find solution for any issue. If government forbid aspects which is used by people they might worse the situation. Despite this, most expert groups suggest that people should be taught what is right or wrong instead of blocking the sources.
In conclusion, mass media such as TV, newspapers and Internet could be controlled by government. Nonetheless, citizens should be allowed to use the technology freely. I believe that people would have permission to all of media and nobody follows them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-16 | Alyona | 89 | view |
| 2022-03-06 | nguyenthanhhoa1904 | 92 | view |
- The graph shows how many people were employed in the Australian mining industry from 1900 to 1990 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
- People attend college or university for many different reasons. Why do you think people attend college or university? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- In the last decade there has been a great increase in the number and variety of online courses available to adults This has been welcomed as a great opportunity by many students however other students see these courses as less effective than classroom tea 78
- In any field of inquiry the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In 80
- Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this.Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...rs tend to find solution for any issue. If government forbid aspects which is used...
^^
Line 3, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t forbid aspects which is used by people they might worse the situation. Despite ...
^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...might worse the situation. Despite this, most expert groups suggest that people s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1336.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04150943396 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71328364761 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607547169811 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.0037390311 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5882352941 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5882352941 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.29411764706 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267950257612 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0735902488032 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.049270611123 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156179735577 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383813178038 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.