Some hold the view that ideas and information should be completely open and there should be no controls on what people can read and watch in the media TV newspapers Internet Do you agree with this view or do you think that in some circumstances government

Concerning the issue of social media, people hold different views. Whilst an army of people persist the idea that materials should be absolutely accessible; the others are of the opinion that governments should restrict access to any secret tidings. From my perspective, I am inclined to the latter group for many convincing reasons.

In the first place, in the light of the fact that the enormous amount of data informed publicly from the mass media is unchecked. But the purpose of people when searching for information is to find authentic sources. If the authorities do not limit the freedom of media, local people will definitely be confused between a lot of untrue, unverified news. This leads to people's misunderstanding of information, more seriously it leads to loss of control over network security. Taking the data about Covid as an example, there was a lot of people spreading Covid cures on social networks without being censored. However, a large number of people believed those things and caused many faulty consequences. Therefore, the materials on Internet shout not be uncontrolled.

In the second place, there is no denying that the State confidential information should be strictly protected. That source is related to many important matters of the country, so it needs to be kept secret from the outside. If such data is disclosed, it will be detrimental or even dangerous to national interests and security. Currently, national secrets are stored extremely carefully by many layers of security in order to avoid leakage. Obviously, it easily understandable that this kind of tidings need to be keep in secret.

Last but not least, it is acknowledged that in our contemporary life, religion has become the technique of persuading people to take part in religious conflict using the Internet. Because of this, some citizens may listen to these callings from people who have wrong religion concepts. From there, they will have false perceptions and be led by the wrong things. Even worse, it could lead to war. And such wars are senseless, causing great damage to human and property. It is obvious that the information sources need to be controlled by the government, in addition, local authorities need to have strict punishments for those who report false news.

In conclusion, for what have been mention above, I fully support the view that politicians should be able to intervene in special cases such as national security reasons. Also they should warn people beware of unsuitable programs.

Votes
Average: 9.2 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
... untrue, unverified news. This leads to peoples misunderstanding of information, more s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 619, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...tworks without being censored. However, a large number of people believed those things and caused...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ases such as national security reasons. Also they should warn people beware of unsui...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, then, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in the first place, in the second place

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 41.998997996 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 410.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17317073171 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8424723426 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578048780488 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 506.74238477 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 16.0721442886 143% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3060597169 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2173913043 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8260869565 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.52173913043 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261565756808 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06524773493 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472897498705 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139559604961 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243174160768 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.