In some offices, employees work in enclosed workstations or cubicles. Other offices have a more open design, in which there are no walls separating employees from their coworkers. Which type of arrangement do you think is most effective? Explain, giving reasons to support your answer.
Workplace design plays an important role in accomplishing tasks. There are particular framework in some offices where employees have to work within an enclosed environment, while in some other places they maintain an open layout. This essay will discuss possible reasons that support both views, and it's impact on workers.
To begin with, in modern days people prefer working with privacy in offices. Thereby, nowadays planning department arrange for secure working conditions. At present time, people have to work smartly online, therefore, they seek for privacy. Besides, they think work strategy should be kept unrevealed as their performance would be evaluated, which might have an impact on their promotion. For example, in the last year one of my cousins got promoted to senior officer based on the evaluation of his work performance, and the strategy he applied to do the tasks. Hence, some authorities think that employees should work in a separated worksite.
On the other hand, in some work stations there are no such enclosed work environment. They think that open workplace might develop better understanding among colleagues. Moreover, workplaces that are not separated by walls can act as an easy monitoring framework. Everybody can watch what other staffs are doing, whether they are doing their duties properly or not for instance. Consequently, every employee conduct their responsibilities accurately.
I would like to conclude by saying, sometimes people find privacy while performing work in a secured environment, and they feel confidence as well. On the contrary, in open workplace design there have a chance to develop better intimacy among the workers. They feel they are members from the same family. However, it totally depends on the psychology of job holders which condition they prefer for working.
- The charts show world pineapple exports by the top three pineapple producing countries in 2009 and 2019 and a breakdown of the cost to the consumer of each pineapple in 2019 73
- Most medical doctors want to work in cities where they will make a lot of money Yet in many rural areas there are not enough doctors What are the reasons for this problem How can it be solved 89
- Studies suggest that many teenagers these days prefer socialising online to meeting one another in person Why do you think this is the case What measures could be taken to encourage teenagers to spend more time meeting one another in person 61
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 78
- Computers are often argued to be the most important invention of the last hundred years To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'frameworks'?
Suggestion: frameworks
...complishing tasks. There are particular framework in some offices where employees have to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 645, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es should work in a separated worksite. On the other hand, in some work stations...
^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rkplaces that are not separated by walls can act as an easy monitoring framework....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, hence, however, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, on the contrary, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38675958188 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78499891667 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606271777003 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2413366533 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8888888889 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9444444444 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279707876537 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815328607145 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616350408186 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166118066398 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499943602819 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.