Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Employees of some companies are required to follow certain rules about clothing and appearance. However, others signify the productivity of the workers rather than their style. Both sides have valid opinions which will be discussed in this essay.
Certain institutions demand their workers to follow dress code and establish punishment systems for those who do not dress smartly. This might be due to the widespread prominence of the organization. Some prestigious fashion companies such as "Chanel" or "Vogue" make their employees follow the discipline and dress up only formal clothes in the workplace. Furthermore, others consider formal clothing as a method of attracting more customers. The clients of the organization might assume that if the workers are dressed formally, they follow strict rules. Thus, they provide customers with better service. Lastly, some authoritative managers of the organization might consider getting the employees to wear formal clothes as a means of having more control over the workers.
However, according to the experience of certain institutions, giving employees freedom of choice over what to wear enhances their productivity. Casual clothes allow people to have more convenience and in turn, increases creativity. For this reason, majority of European companies allow their workers to wear informal clothes in the workplace as they focus on to achieve top levels of efficiency. For the sole purpose of making the company more successful, managers allow the workers to wear casual clothes with the help of which they can achieve peak productivity.
In conclusion, by means of establishing dress codes and charging those who break the rule, companies can have more control over the workers. However, to have a steep progress managers should allow employees to wear convenient clothes where they can perform better.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 89 | view |
| 2024-07-25 | linh allie | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | maria ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-27 | dolle123 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-11 | johnlark1908 | 56 | view |
- In some countries it is illegal for companies to reject job applicants for their age Is it a positive or negative development 78
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world They should therefore be introduced into classrooms and their programs used for direct teaching purposes However dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students Discuss bot 84
- Some countries have legal ages at which people can drink Other countries believe not have strick laws is a better policy Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- In schools and universities girls tend to choose arts while boys like science What are the reasons for this trend and do you think this tendency should be changed Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or ex 73
- People have to spend more and more time to travel their homes for job and study What are the reasons How can we solve this problem 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, thus, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1602.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.6013986014 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99002367492 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524475524476 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7539306233 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.875 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131234768358 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0466766147501 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0351961959909 0.0667982634062 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0918422210806 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454480253849 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.9 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.