In working environments, some corporations put a serious emphasis on their staffs' appearance while other institutions give their higher regard for the working quality rather than how their workers dress. The two opinions are both reasonable and this essay will analyze these theories.
In the beginning, it is plausible to say that employees should put on smart and suitable outfits when working at the offices. The first reason is related to personal self-esteem, in other words, if the staffs have an impressive and formal appearance by dressing, they can feel more confident and comfortable in the workplaces. As a great result, the working quality can briefly be thrust. The second reason is that the employees' image is an essential standard in accessing their organisation's working condition. For example, a well-established institution such as a school will force its personnel to wear uniforms when working. Meanwhile, a dance club will allow their staffs to dress freely and comfortably.
By contrast, other organisations suppose that working quality should be prioritized. According to this, these organisers believe that images and appearance are no more than external forms, but the employees' ability is prominent. For example, an agent can dress up attractively and formally but a lack of communication skill can do nothing with marketing and bargaining that needed by a company.
Finally, in my opinion, combining the two former ideas is the best answer. It means that a perfect employee that every corporation need is a human with a great compound of beauty and an awesome fashion taste, especially with important skills and knowledge the work required.
In conclusion, in the working ambience, to promote the woking quality, both appearance and labouring capacity should be paid the equal attention.
- The plans below show a student room for two students and a student room for one student at an Australian university 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
- The chart and table below give information about population figures in Japan Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as South pole Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people are working longer hours Why is this happening What problems can this cause to people 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...re no more than external forms, but the employees ability is prominent. For example, an a...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, finally, first, if, second, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36013986014 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99267407141 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594405594406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7113450762 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.5 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306973615954 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965989574224 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065987763168 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163463282496 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0794228272336 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.