Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time. In there opinion children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences.
It is undisputed that books are medium for gaining knowledge and collecting informations. Presently, some parents reckon that books providing amusement to the children is worthless and it leads to wastage of time. By contrast, they think only academic or educational books are grave to the children. In my view, off springs must have freedom to read recreational books along with academic books. This essay intends to discord with the given statement firmly and some logical points will be discussed in upcoming paragraphs.
There are numerous point to endorse my point of view. First and foremost, entertainment book based on stories can be a massive source of inspirations for the children. To demonstrate, such books can have life changing impacts on them by motivating to applying better ways on their lives. Taking a real life example inti consideration, in my childhood, on my birthday, i was gifted by a story book. That book had some motivational stories. One of them with title 'Union is strength' was the story of an old farmer who had four sons who quarreled every times. But, farmer brought unity among them with the help of few tricks. This book seriously inspired me towards the value of unity. Consequently, Such entertaining book plays magnificent role in life of pupils.
Further, emphasizing on my point of view, children become fed up or frustrated if they are forced to read only educational books. In fact, they will certainly loss their intrigue towards reading. Indeed, they should be free to read recreational books in free time to revitalize their energies and to remain psychologically fit.
To Recapitulate, undeniably, both educational and entertainment books are indispensable for them. I totally disagree with this statement because recreational books boon the children to refresh their mind .
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-10-26 | binita karki | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. 56
- The gap between the rich and the poor people is increasingly widespread, as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer. What problems could this situation cause? What are the solutions to address the problem. 56
- Some people think that government should invest in arts and cultural events. Others think that government should invest money on more important things. 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 67
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time In there opinion children should only read serious educational books Do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences 41
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 369, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...ation, in my childhood, on my birthday, i was gifted by a story book. That book h...
^
Line 7, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntertainment books are indispensable for them. I totally disagree with this state...
^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... boon the children to refresh their mind .
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, so, in fact, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22448979592 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98178709749 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3949264365 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8421052632 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.78947368421 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213381868511 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686147455083 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499094508542 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141347059086 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330884171276 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.