The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The graph gives an information about variations and varieties of fast food that Australian teenagers consumed in the period of 25 years.
In general, It is viewed that both hamburgers and pizza attend an upward trend while fish and chips follow a decreasing pattern.
To begin, in the beginning of 1975, Pizza stood at zero which was consistently increased and reached to around 82 in 1995. After that, the graph went on a plateau until the end of period. Similarly, Hamburgers experienced almost same pattern as pizza. It started with abrupt rise until 1985 and became just above 80. Then there was a slight increase until the end of period.
On the other hand, Fish and Chips stood at 100 and sharply declined from 100 to below 40 between 1975 to 2000 with a great fluctuation between 82 and 98.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 78
- Some parents believe that reading entertainment book is a waste of time. In there opinion children should only read serious, educational books. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include relevant examples from your own experiences. 67
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 79
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 67
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 667.0 965.302439024 69% => OK
No of words: 140.0 196.424390244 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76428571429 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.43979062825 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49074818691 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.671428571429 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 185.4 283.868780488 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3528362377 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.375 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160092060175 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560045830529 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0829972123724 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100153211089 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0972067918794 0.0819641961636 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.