The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000.
The line graph compares the consumption of three different food product groups of young people in Australia between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, it is clear that both three food product groups saw a considerable fluctuation during the period shown. There was a decline on consumption of fish and chips while other food groups were consumed higher by the teenagers in Australia.
It can be seen from the graph that in 1975, the most popular food product group was fish and chips. At about 100 times eaten per year in 1975, it fell sharply to less than 40 times in 2000 although its fluctuation between 1975 and 1985.
Over the same period, the expenditure on both pizza and hamburgers increased. From 5 times eaten pizza in 1975, it rose rapidly to more than 80 times in 1995. By contrast, 5 years later, it remained above 80 times. The times eaten hamburgers was 10 in 1975, this figure went up significantly to roughly 85 times. In following decade, the amount of hamburgers which was eaten increased steadily to exactly 100 times that its was the highest point of the whole line graph. At the end of period, this figures still remained 100 times. It was, therefore, the most popular fast food was consumed by the Australian teenagers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Sheetal Bataniya | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-28 | asdasdasd | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Ashley Cheung | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | iamkristinjoi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-19 | Bao Trang | 73 | view |
- The graph shows the percentage of adolescents following a vegerarian diet. 73
- Some people believe that schools are no longer necessary because students can get so much information through the Internet and study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 84
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and town B in 1960 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1024.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76279069767 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48648048076 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3850292085 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.3333333333 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9166666667 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231595632087 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082121102469 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067993740015 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1509104979 0.15604864568 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366575042344 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.27 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.