Some people argue that immigrants should adopt the local culture when immigrating to a new country. An alternative view is that they can adapt to new environment by establishing a minority community. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is an indisputable fact that the last 20 years has seen a dramatic increase in the number of immigrants to other countries on the grounds that the borders between nations become gradually blurred. Whilst there remains some disagreement as to whether immigrants should adapt to new cultures or they could stay in small groups and follow the own social norms, I intend to believe that it is the responsibility of immigrants to observe the accepted rules of behavior in their adopted countries, both written and unwritten.
On the one hand, it is an undeniable fact that there are a multitude of minority groups in different parts of the world. A particularly salient example is that in America, areas such as Little Saigon or China Town are well-known for the traditions and customs of Vietnamese and Chinese, correspondingly. These immigrants are inclined to utilize their own languages and follow their own social norms. Although cultural diversity could increase the color and vibrancy, it is my belief that distinctions might alienate migrants from the locals. These Vietnamese and Chinese, therefore, rarely participate in communal activities.
On the other hand, if migrants are willing to adapt to cultural norms in adopted countries, they are more likely to facilitate societal cohesion. A specifically notable example is that the young generation tended to learn new languages and adopted the patterns of behavior and societal rules in their destination countries and they literally became an indispensable part of these countries. It is my belief that similarities are inclined to unite people whilst distinctions are prone to divide. In this sense, too much cultural diversity is detrimental to both migrants and the locals; and a strong society is a homogenous one with shared values, goals, and beliefs.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that migrants should contemplate adapting to new societal norms and culture in their adopted countries. The large influx of immigrants to some countries nowadays might result in pressing matters at large and therefore, research into this phenomenon would be warranted.
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing.What is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society?How can this problem be solved? 73
- The graph shows the number of boys and girls playing sport in an English town in 2012 79
- The chart shows the percentage of drugs taken by girls and boys in a school in New Zealand. 67
- Highest education level of women in someland 67
- The bar chart shows the monthly spending in dollars of a family in the USA on three items in 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
... Whilst there remains some disagreement as to whether immigrants should adapt to new cultures...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 543, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this Vietnamese' or ''?
Suggestion: This Vietnamese;
...ight alienate migrants from the locals. These Vietnamese and Chinese, therefore, rarely particip...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, therefore, well, as to, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30205278592 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95941943876 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521994134897 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.5452262402 49.4020404114 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.076923077 106.682146367 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2307692308 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213808144087 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671133826658 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0607639787431 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136248180699 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590385093123 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.78957915832 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.