Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
According to some fraction of the society argued that academic studies are more beneficiary while others have a contradictory view-point that practical subjects such as motor mechanics and cooking will derive more benefits. As such there are both merits and demerits of this trend, this essay will discuss about both points of view.
Moreover, factual evidence of enhancement of theoretical knowledge could be witnessed with the guarantee of this move. By learning academical subject such as chemistry, physics and history led students for more career opportunities and also higher education perspectives. But only from the academic subjects will not pave the way to realise about gaps and limitations of the globe.
Furthermore, most of us have sense that students with practical knowledge are step ahead than others when adapting for any situation and escalate day to day life style. The practical knowledge will escalate students who came from a fragile background and suffer from marginalization to rise above their genes. Even the academic students may have to learn how to cook and how to fix a car somewhere in their life journey.
To sum up, in view of the arguments outlined above, I can conclude that students should study academic subjects as well as practical.
- Some people believe that academic subjects such as chemistry, physics and history should be taught in schools, while others believe that students will derive more benefit from studying practical subjects, such as motor mechanics and cooking. Discuss both 50
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, such as, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 1615.20841683 66% => OK
No of words: 205.0 315.596192385 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2243902439 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 4.20363070211 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80260777687 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624390243902 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 342.0 506.74238477 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3315862601 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.357410835465 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130861521699 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926022404821 0.0667982634062 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195333503491 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885081051912 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.