Every year we see increasing number of wild animals that getting extinct and this comes in the backdrop of increasing number of species moving to endangered animals list. Some people are of the opinion that we should attempt of save all wild animals while others believe that we should cherry pick a handful few with focused efforts on saving them.
Firstly, wild animals an integral part of Earth’s ecosystem and they have as much right to our planet as much as human beings. Due to over exploitation of finite resources which leads to shrinking area under forest cover, many wild animals are getting wiped out. Since we humans are primary cause of their endangerment, it becomes our obligation to protect all the animals. While planning to safeguard their existence, we should aim to cover all the animals rather than the select few. Moreover, there are no objective deterministic factors which could help decide which animals should be protected. One could argue that we should save the animals which are fewer in numbers like Asiatic lions or African but I tend to disagree with this method simply because of that if our drive to save one animals is comprehensive and scalable then this would automatically cover large species.
The other side of the coin where we focus efforts on saving preferred one isn’t totally invalid. As noble as our cause of saving is it requires copious amounts of funding and volunteers to make it happen. And therefore, it becomes important to weigh our priorities. This money could be used for humanitarian causes like feeding hungry or vaccinating population in third world countries. However, the most important counter argument to this is that the Earth’s ecosystem might have unpredictable detrimental efforts should we attempt to save a select few.
In conclusion, we should attempt to save all species of the wild animals as it could potentially have upsetting effects.
- It is not necessary to travel to other places to learn the culture of other people We can just learn much from books films and the Internet Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that entertainers are paid too much and their impact on the society is negative while others disagree and believe that they deserve the money they make because of their positive effect on others Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 790, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one animal', 'an animal', or simply 'animals'?
Suggestion: one animal; an animal; animals
...ly because of that if our drive to save one animals is comprehensive and scalable then this...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1604.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05993690852 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6311758035 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555205047319 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2971273574 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.571428571 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6428571429 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294270769735 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100436091212 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810740483334 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195895460195 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842550559221 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.