Some people believe charity organizations should only offer help to people of their own country. Others claim that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live. Discuss both views and give your opinions.
That poverty is becoming a global issue has raised conflict notions as to charitable work. It is advised that charitable organizations provide aid to the disadvantaged only with a country, while another school of thought is that these organizations should also support impoverished people worldwide. Both of these notions will be considered in this essay and the author’s perspective will be then outlined.
On the one hand, the perspective of supporting merely domestic underprivileged residents is reasonable when it comes to private organizations that stem from a country. These organizations receive funding and resources from domestic sponsors and inhabitants, by dint of which their objectives commonly aim to give aid to people in need in certain regions. In Vietnam, for instance, SUN organization receives donations from local donors and provide home and clothing for children especially in the southern region. Furthermore, the lack of sponsorship when there are a myriad of essential aspects that need to support such as necessities and sanitary conditions may contribute to these charitable organizations’ incapability of funding for the impoverished worldwide.
On the other hand, lending a helping hand to disadvantaged residents regardless of where they live not only helps build up a mutually beneficial relationship between countries but this is an international moral responsibility as well. The approach perhaps refers to certain international organizations which are sponsored by a number of nations, especially affluent countries such as UNICEF. Thanks to the abundance of financial resources, UNICEF is capable of provide learning opportunity for children in Africa by constructing schools in different regions.
To recapitulate, I believe the choice of helping national underprivileged residents or people worldwide depends on resources and objectives of each charity organization. In either ways, these organizations have a meaningful aim of combating poverty issue.
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is it the case Is it a positive development 84
- The Graph shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Topic Some people claim that tourism can help to bridge cultural gaps between people of different nationalities and cultures Do you agree or disagree 94
- The table below shows statistics about the top five countries for international tourism in 2012 and 2013 84
- Most people do not care enough about environmental issues To what extent to do agree or disagree with this statement 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 567, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...he lack of sponsorship when there are a myriad of essential aspects that need to suppo...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, then, well, while, as to, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80272108844 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4400520451 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581632653061 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.342162581 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.166666667 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27415325622 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865454728649 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0766643965751 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15109196697 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274719504218 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.66 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.