Some people believe citizens should be allowed to carry handguns in order to protect themselves, while others think this can lead to many social security problems in the society . What's your opinion ?
Citizen ownership of firearms has been a controversial debate for legislators. While the concept of allowing the equipment of weapons by citizens has been lawfully recognized in a few nations due to the belief that it can boost citizens' self-defence capabilities, others believe the social insecurity it causes outweighs its counterarguments. Personally speaking, I agree with the latter statement, illustrated by the following reasons.
First and foremost, guns are weapons designed to kill or wounded people. Hence, it is undeniable that an increase in the rate of arms in the population will lead to a similar trend in crime rates. The allowance of citizens to have handguns is equivalent to allowing criminals easy access to weapons themselves, resulting in growing danger for the public. For instance, a comparison between the two countries of the USA and Japan has demonstrated the detrimental effects of gun ownership on a national scale, with considerable differences in various data, such as the death rates of officers during missions or the incredibly alarming homicidal incidents: 18000 and 14. The figures are an illustration of the hazardous impact of armed offenders that the legislation has accidentally abetted.
Additionally, the psychological influence exerted upon a weaponized individual is irrefutable due to the weight of the damage a gun can bring.
In combination with the emotional aspect of humans and the intense atmosphere of the situation, it cannot be avoided that accidental actions may happen. And even in the most reasonable circumstances and sensible individuals, faulty errors might pop up, both in the human and equipment department. Allowing the free acquisition of firearms will have an adverse effect on society as it will result in an upturn in the probability of such incidental perpetrations, as indicated by various heartwrenching incidents reported on the media.
In conclusion, persuasion for the legalization of unprohibited weapon access has a myriad of justifications. Nonetheless, the negative consequences it can have on people are indisputable. Therefore, the formalisation of such regulation should be objected to at all causes.
- The time people devote to the job leaves very little time for personal life How widespread is the problem What problem will this shortage of time cause 84
- Some people think that uniform at school is unnecessary and should be done away with while others disagree stating its benefits in helping to dissuade discrimination and division based on attire in an educational environment Discuss both viewpoints and gi 95
- Some people believe citizens should be allowed to carry handguns in order to protect themselves while others think this can lead to many social security problems in the society What s your opinion 92
- In some countries shopping online is replacing shopping at stores Discuss both the pros and cons of this trend 93
- Petroleum is the dominant fuel source for various vehicles nowadays Therefore a rise in its price is often suggested to reduce the growing number of conveyances on the road However although such intervention can have some effect on the problem in my opini 95
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53731343284 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40664375198 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1362483551 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13932528269 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391214457749 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482086102639 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699856469511 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414568003657 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, may, nonetheless, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53731343284 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40664375198 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 594.9 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.1362483551 49.4020404114 142% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.666666667 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.26666666667 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13932528269 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391214457749 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482086102639 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0699856469511 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0414568003657 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.04 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 134.0 78.4519038076 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.