Some people believe environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
it is often argued that pollution and problems related to the ecosystem should be raised and resolved internationally, whilst others disagree and think it is a national issue to deal with the deterioration of nature. this essay will discuss both points of view.
it is obvious that fighting for the development of nature is necessary. If an international body were appointed for this, it would be beneficial to many third world countries that cannot afford to include the restoration of the environment in their budget. it is therefore agreed that problems like climate change are better handled and funded at a global level. For instance, the world Health Organisation is an international body, funded by many countries, helps people in poor nations to overcome diseases.
However, some disagree and feel that nations should be responsible and fight individually. They feel that the government of a nation knows better the country better than any global organization and thus can be more effective. Despite understanding, there is a risk of businessmen influencing the bureaucrats and get away with the regulations imposed. Whereas, an international body is not affiliated with any specific government and can perform efficiently. Numerous studies show that ruling parties in many countries are corrupted. there is also a fear that some countries might be neglected when handling many countries. But since there are representatives from each country there is less probability of sidelining any country.
In conclusion, the benefits of dealing with environment problems at the international level outweigh that of at the national level. Hence, this essay agrees that a separate body created with the help of all countries can be more productive at making this world a better place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-11 | Siva69 | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-17 | subashtimalsina112 | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | lusinelusine | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-27 | lusinelusine | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 67
- Scientists and technology experts seem to be more valued by modern society than musicians and artists. To what extent do you agree. 61
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money.What is your opinion? 67
- The pie charts show the percentage of students joining North West University 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and give y 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is often argued that pollution and prob...
^^
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... deal with the deterioration of nature. this essay will discuss both points of view....
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ll discuss both points of view. it is obvious that fighting for the develo...
^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ion of the environment in their budget. it is therefore agreed that problems like ...
^^
Line 13, column 534, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...arties in many countries are corrupted. there is also a fear that some countries migh...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, third, thus, whereas, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3829787234 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09091529426 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.560283687943 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8809203881 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.2 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172828181238 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056572230851 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0438810398817 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111708454099 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411091336021 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.