The chart below shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008.
The bar chart provides information about the proportion of women, men, and children who consumed five servings of fruit and vegetables in 8 years from 2001 to 2008 in the UK.
Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage of all people who consumed fruit and vegetables was women, while children accounted for the lowest proportion.
Furthermore, a significant increase in the percentage of people having these food items can be seen over the given period.
The percentage of women who ate fruit and vegetables started at just over 20% in 2001. This figure steadily increased and reached a peak at about 35% in 2006, before falling slightly to 30% in 2008.
In terms of men and children, the rate remained relatively stable in the first three years(about 17% and 12% respectively). From this point, the percentage of men climbed gradually to a peak of 27% in both 2006 and 2007, after which it dropped to just over 25% in 2008. Similar growth in the figure is evident for children reaching 25% in 2006 and around 24% in the final year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-30 | MichaelP | 67 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | cutecutecue | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | nami | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | prathamp114 | 89 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | rojababa | 73 | view |
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two years. 73
- The pie charts show the percentage of students joining North West University 67
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- There are an increasing number of people who do not know their neighbours. What causes this situations? How to solve it 11
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75824175824 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60891248318 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 246.6 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6992779689 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.25 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27868045984 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118335826028 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115244432692 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159283972781 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0983099835741 0.0819641961636 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.