Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The rate of advanced education attendance is believed to be an adequate standard to assess the economic growth of a country as it sufficiently demonstrates the intellectual level of the population. However, due to the cost of such education, it has been the gateway blocking many talented individuals on account of their economic situation. Hence, the notion that the government should fund students' tuition regardless of their socio-economic backgrounds is gaining momentum among people, as they believe it is a universal right. In my opinion, however, although there is a solid foundation supporting this argument, I do not agree with the statement for the following reasons.
First and foremost, it is true that tertiary education should be unhindered to everyone to allow people to have an opportunity to attain a higher degree, helping them diversify their options or assist them on their career paths. Its value would be further emphasised to undergraduates who do not have the privilege of affording university attendance, as it will be an invaluable opportunity for them to open doors to various occupations that can help improve their finances. Furthermore, this can have a positive impact on the workforce due to the increase in professional employees in the market to support a growing economy.
However, I also believe it should not be the administration's responsibility to subsidize tuition completely. Because of the burden on the national finance such intervention may cause, it could lead to adverse effects on the population, for instance, decreasing infrastructure quality or an increased tax rate on the general public. A massive influx to the labour market might also lead to unwanted consequences, such as a bloated workforce, which can generate laziness and diminishing creativity and competition, unadvantageous traits for developing enterprises. Despite all of these, nonetheless, it is inadvisable to have no support handed out to students, as exemptions and scholarships will encourage competition between students, guaranteeing the tickets for only the best to allow a competitive environment of only the most capable students.
In conclusion, while citizens' right to pursue tertiary education is indisputable, the expense of such pursuits should not be in the hand of the national executives, regardless of justifications, on account of the possible detriments it can bring. Only minor assistance should be allocated to entice development among students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-01 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-26 | Kiwi | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 56 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | dieulinhxinhgai | 61 | view |
- It is more important for students to study local history instead of global history To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The typical teaching situation of a teacher and students in the class will not exist by the year 2050 To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 11
- Some people think that employers should not be concerned about how employees dress at work but the quality of work only To what extent do you agree or disagree 96
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'administrations'' or 'administration's'?
Suggestion: administrations'; administration's
...er, I also believe it should not be the administrations responsibility to subsidize tuition com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...quality or an increased tax rate on the general public. A massive influx to the labour market ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50785340314 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33844668703 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0691283613 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.846153846 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3846153846 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190569294822 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614640807333 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462262916017 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105273285319 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340190641353 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 46, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'administrations'' or 'administration's'?
Suggestion: administrations'; administration's
...er, I also believe it should not be the administrations responsibility to subsidize tuition com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 316, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...quality or an increased tax rate on the general public. A massive influx to the labour market ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2104.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50785340314 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33844668703 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570680628272 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.0691283613 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.846153846 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3846153846 20.7667163134 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190569294822 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0614640807333 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462262916017 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105273285319 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0340190641353 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.2 13.0946893788 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.12 50.2224549098 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.27 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.49 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.