Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government spending has always been a debatable issue especially with the constructions. While the government spends their money for constructing new buildings can result in various advantages such as population emigration and local city activation, renovating existing buildings can be beneficial financially. In my perspective, while I understand that the constructing of new buildings can provide various important facilities that can encourage people to move between cities, renovating buildings can be financially saved and which money can be used for the better communities.
To begin with, construction of new buildings produces economy to grow. The possibility of withdrawing people from outer cities to inner modernized cities can lead to economic enhancement due to enjoy the modern and cleaner look of cities. With the cleaner environments, people can enjoy more of atmosphere and they can feel more attached to the areas. Since more people are coming into this newer area, the more economic growth can be expected and this will become a metropolitan area. Thus, it can help to an economic growth.
In contrast, the economic growth can also be achieved by renovating the existing buildings. A renovation will be cheaper than constructing for the newer buildings and which saved money can be used to construct public facilities for their entertainment and relaxation reasons. For example, constructing fees for the government to develop a city, in case of Perth, budgeted for more than $30 billion to design Perth city to be having a modernized look. However, in the case of Melbourne city, they renovated their cities every year because of wear and tear; the money saved from the unnecessary constructions can be used to improve public health systems. From these two cities comparisons, we can conclude that the governmental budgets can be used to renovate so that other public benefits can be entitled.
In conclusion, the budgeted money from the government to be used on creating new buildings in the areas can have short term attractiveness from the public despite the financial issues. Therefore, the amount of money spent on newer buildings and renovation should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any impulsive spending.
- The chart below shows the percentage of children aged 0 to 5 and adults aged 60 and over, selected Census years. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 67
- The map below shows three proposed sites for a new hypermarket A B and C in the city of Pellington 91
- The pie charts below show responses by teachers of foreign languages in Britain to a survey concerning why their students are learning a foreign language. The first chart shows the main reason for learning a foreign language. The second chart shows how ma 73
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major German airports between 2007 and 2012 89
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230569948187 0.247107183377 93% => OK
Verbs: 0.178756476684 0.155533422707 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.108808290155 0.0946595960268 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0284974093264 0.0501214627716 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233160621762 0.0437548338989 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.121761658031 0.122226691241 100% => OK
Participles: 0.0699481865285 0.0403226058552 173% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01346632375 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0414507772021 0.0326793684256 127% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0880829015544 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0544041450777 0.021408717616 254% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00777202072539 0.011925033212 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2247.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 354.0 316.048096192 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.34745762712 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.38418079096 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305084745763 0.28420135186 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.245762711864 0.203846283523 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.186440677966 0.137316102897 136% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01346632375 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505649717514 0.56093040696 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.3986952211 60.7387585426 88% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.6 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.0839703774 49.517814964 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.8 127.492653851 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7743622355 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 54.1084745763 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.83146067416 1.69124875643 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120278386886 0.332605444948 36% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.177725017115 0.102741220458 173% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0784563548033 0.0668466124924 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.583484738332 0.534860350844 109% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159934030083 0.148594505496 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060952218381 0.134430193775 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0252085817888 0.0742795772207 34% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408795584648 0.324371583561 126% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0722048425094 0.0638462369009 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948412347993 0.228012699653 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127600302039 0.058150111329 22% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 5.90881763527 203% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.