Some people believe that government should spend money on new building rather than renovating existing building. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government spending has always been a debatable issue especially with the constructions. While the government spends their money for constructing new buildings can result in various advantages such as population emigration and local city activation, renovating existing buildings can be beneficial financially. In my perspective, while I understand that the constructing of new buildings can provide various important facilities that can encourage people to move between cities, renovating buildings can be financially saved and which money can be used for the better communities.
To begin with, construction of new buildings produces economy to grow. The possibility of withdrawing people from outer cities to inner modernized cities can lead to economic enhancement due to enjoy the modern and cleaner look of cities. With the cleaner environments, people can enjoy more of atmosphere and they can feel more attached to the areas. Since more people are coming into this newer area, the more economic growth can be expected and this will become a metropolitan area. Thus, it can help to an economic growth.
In contrast, the economic growth can also be achieved by renovating the existing buildings. A renovation will be cheaper than constructing for the newer buildings and which saved money can be used to construct public facilities for their entertainment and relaxation reasons. For example, constructing fees for the government to develop a city, in case of Perth, budgeted for more than $30 billion to design Perth city to be having a modernized look. However, in the case of Melbourne city, they renovated their cities every year because of wear and tear; the money saved from the unnecessary constructions is used for improving public health systems. From these two cities comparisons, we can conclude that the governmental budgets can be used to renovate so that other public benefits can be entitled.
In conclusion, the budgeted money from the government to be used on creating new buildings in the areas can have short term attractiveness from the public despite the financial issues. Therefore, the amount of money spent on newer buildings and renovation should be monitored and watched closely to prevent any impulsive spending.
- The Graph below shows the averaged results for one of the two school trials, illustrating the substantial difference in growth rate between egg chickens and meat chickens. 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- Students have a right to get education and university education fees should be freely available. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 70
- The table below highlights data on the number of travelers using three major German airports between 2007 and 2012 89
- Some people believe that hobbies should be challenging to be enjoyable. What are the advantages and disadvantages of maintaining a challenging pastime? 78
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'however', 'look', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in contrast', 'such as', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231168831169 0.247107183377 94% => OK
Verbs: 0.179220779221 0.155533422707 115% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109090909091 0.0946595960268 115% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0285714285714 0.0501214627716 57% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0233766233766 0.0437548338989 53% => OK
Prepositions: 0.124675324675 0.122226691241 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0727272727273 0.0403226058552 180% => Less participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.01748523097 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Infinitives: 0.038961038961 0.0326793684256 119% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0883116883117 0.0861772015684 102% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0519480519481 0.021408717616 243% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.00779220779221 0.011925033212 65% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2246.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 353.0 316.048096192 112% => OK
Chars per words: 6.36260623229 6.12580529183 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20517956788 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.385269121813 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.305949008499 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.249291784703 0.203846283523 122% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.189801699717 0.137316102897 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01748523097 2.80594681477 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.037074148 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509915014164 0.56093040696 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 53.9786653516 60.7387585426 89% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0891783567 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5333333333 20.7743622355 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.025267659 49.517814964 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.733333333 127.492653851 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 20.7743622355 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.814263465372 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.99599198397 0% => OK
Readability: 54.1282341832 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.85393258427 1.69124875643 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119585000669 0.332605444948 36% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.177106047484 0.102741220458 172% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0798917049179 0.0668466124924 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.573833769968 0.534860350844 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.159892247053 0.148594505496 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0598817662394 0.134430193775 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0267112079619 0.0742795772207 36% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.393856986547 0.324371583561 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.064300473248 0.0638462369009 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939404619541 0.228012699653 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133921958652 0.058150111329 23% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.68436873747 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 5.90881763527 203% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 2.5751503006 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 10.4468937876 134% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.