Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business, and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Exchanging information generally is a debatable topic, as it relies on the importance of the shared subject. Although it might seem, at first glance, beneficial, it proved to be catastrophic in certain situations. This essay is discussing the complexity of the matter, as well as how to govern it.
Sharing critical information, that -by any means- can threaten or damage a party is a risky action. For instance, a company, which its income is based on a specific product, shared its blueprints publicly and gave a chance to competitors to manufacture it, who will certainly get a market share. If the original company had concealed its secrets, it would have dominated the market without any rivals. The same idea applies to all of these sensitive data, as it was hard-won. Thus, there are similar cases, when hiding and even encrypting data is crucial for sustainability. Such information that could menace a public figure, copyright, government or an army.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, giving out information is known to be vital to the progress of humanity. For example, if people stopped sharing information, we would absolutely become extinct, because our languages would disappear, relationships between people would become limited and most importantly, the knowledge, that we have gained till now, would simply vanish due to its concealment. On the contrary, as long as we are sharing knowledge, we could develop it, invent new sciences and secure our place knowledge in such cases of educational purposes is not only beneficial to everyone but also insurance of our survivability.
Information should be classified into categories of significance, after that, it is possible to assess its value and hence determine whether to share it or not. Furthermore, the essay discussed the two views and I stat with none of them because information must be evaluated before it can be shared.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-11 | Moustafa Noufale | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-02 | gudupatnaik1996 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Mohammadjavad | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | mytran234 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-11 | Mishika sugandhi | 61 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 81
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Claim: No act is done purely for the benefit of others.Reason: All actions — even those that seem to be done for other people — are based on self-interest.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim a 50
- the purpose of higher education is to prepare students for the future, but Classen students are at a serious disadvantage in the competition for post-college employment due to the University's burden-some breadth requirements. Classen's job plac 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1622.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26623376623 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08058374421 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646103896104 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 10.0 2.10420841683 475% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3253701204 49.4020404114 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.857142857 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173449626193 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586335535987 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474327529357 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112919367972 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421651399559 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.