Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these view and give your own opinion.
Whether sharing scientific discoveries worth for sharers or not is becoming a big question baffling our community. In my perspective, I think it is better when researchers public their work on the academic world.
Data sharing may be good for both sharers and their society. The sharers will be recognized as one of the 'geneous and talented scientists'. Public journals will write about those kind people because of their stunning scientific progress and generousity to share.
When thinking about the stream of researchs, I personally have a sense of admiration to the Curie's findings about radioactive and chemical elements. After hard-working hours, the Curie's decided to spread it out to all those who is struggling in discovering compelling ways to cure cancer patients and one's on the verge of death desiring for a new method to live. The Curie's generousity contributes a valuable source for continuous innovations. What the two kind scientist gave us helped to hold hope for a healthier future and improvement of science.
Besides, we can no deny that some scientists are shellfish when they find something new and useful. Perhaps, this behavior's existance is a symbol for people immersing in modern world: stony. In my viewpoint, this kind of selfishness is often viewed and difficult to change. As individual want their findings to be unique, worth money and worth for their industriousness after a long time. Maybe, it is not selfishness, it is exactly called 'humantarism'.
If it was you, will you willing to let your discoveries be propagated? If I were a talented scientist, I will always be ready. When it comes to myself, I choose to be a person who bring sustainable value for continuous innovations.
- In many countries today people in cities either live alone or in small family units rather than in large family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 56
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades 73
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The graph below shows the percentage change in places where students lived over five decades 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these view and give 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 109, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...find something new and useful. Perhaps, this behaviors existance is a symbol for peo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, so, i think, kind of, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1437.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09574468085 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01868874953 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606382978723 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9863904644 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5294117647 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5882352941 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23529411765 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120171403378 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.039729363243 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0387050671094 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0731302964787 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476831771346 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.