Some people believe that it is impossible to help everyone in need around the world. That is why governments should only focus on helping people of their own country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples
Since world has become a global village, countries have created relation of brotherhood and harmony around the world and offer help to each other at every critical situation. Whether government should focus on their own people or they shall offer help to other countries too has sparked a heated debate. Here I would like to discord with the given statement
Multifarious points are there to shore up my point of view, First and foremost, helping other is trait of mankind, being human it is duty of our to help each and everyone who is in trouble. However, government should always be ready to help countries around the world. Furthermore, 'give and take' is the rule of humanity, hence government shall always be ready to help other countries to ensure the help in return when in need
Further emphasising on my point of view, helping other nations strengthen the bonding of two particular nations and set the example in front of other nations to treat this universe like a family. To be specific, Indian cricket board helped west indies financially in 2003 and got the same help in 2011 in return when they were surrounded by mammoth financial crisis. On the contrary, others have conflicting views.
They claim that, government ought to concentrate on their own people as in rush of helping other countries government can neglect the common needs of their own inhabitants. What is more, any countries is never a perfect place to live in, so, the help that suppose to be sent to other countries, could be utilized to make their own place better in term of lifestyle.
To recapitulate, priorities of evolving own nation cannot be neglected, still countries should offer every possible help to the countries in trouble on account of humanity
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-07 | sahilverma16 | 56 | view |
- Nowadays it is possible to use computers and mobile phones for automatic language translation and there is no need for human translators and interpreters Do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- : Some people say that the government should invest in trains and the subway system to prevent traffic congestion in large cities. Others, however, think it should build wider roads. Discuss both views and give your own opinion and examples. 64
- Some people think that governments must insist on preserving traditional appearance of old buildings undergoing renovation or redevelopment. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement? 67
- The graphs below show the number of visitors to two cities in a given year. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 61
- Some people think that mothers should spend most of their time raising family‚ and therefore the government should support them financially.Do you agree or disagree?? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 98, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
... own people as in rush of helping other countries government can neglect the common needs...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 256, Rule ID: SUPPOSE_TO[1]
Message: Probably you should use a past participle here: 'supposed'.
Suggestion: supposed
...ect place to live in, so, the help that suppose to be sent to other countries, could be...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'on the contrary', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.238390092879 0.247107183377 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.176470588235 0.155533422707 113% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0990712074303 0.0946595960268 105% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0402476780186 0.0501214627716 80% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0371517027864 0.0437548338989 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.117647058824 0.122226691241 96% => OK
Participles: 0.046439628483 0.0403226058552 115% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.61095760527 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0526315789474 0.0326793684256 161% => OK
Particles: 0.0030959752322 0.00163938923432 189% => OK
Determiners: 0.0712074303406 0.0861772015684 83% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.030959752322 0.021408717616 145% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.015479876161 0.011925033212 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1740.0 1933.35771543 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 316.048096192 94% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87837837838 6.12580529183 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20517956788 99% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.331081081081 0.374742101984 88% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.243243243243 0.28420135186 86% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.162162162162 0.203846283523 80% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.121621621622 0.137316102897 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61095760527 2.80594681477 93% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.037074148 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557432432432 0.56093040696 99% => OK
Word variations: 58.2050839596 60.7387585426 96% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0891783567 62% => OK
Sentence length: 29.6 20.7743622355 142% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.4629728509 49.517814964 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 174.0 127.492653851 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.6 20.7743622355 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.814263465372 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 53.9243243243 49.1944974215 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.58536585366 1.69124875643 94% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41485703801 0.332605444948 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.126003463434 0.102741220458 123% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0816473382508 0.0668466124924 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.639400658772 0.534860350844 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.190986068731 0.148594505496 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.192409264995 0.134430193775 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703506440952 0.0742795772207 95% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334979319651 0.324371583561 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0355482716203 0.0638462369009 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.256911542335 0.228012699653 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663466507126 0.058150111329 114% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.41683366733 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 7.0 5.90881763527 118% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 9.0 10.4468937876 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.