some people believe it's best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. others argue that its better to try and improve such situations
discuss both views and give your opinion
Human beings are blessed with the ability to learn, incorporate and innovate for thousands of years, whereas one set of people believe its better to adapt to situations irrespective of its destructive tendancy towards ones job or wealth, while others contradict this statement, saying they should help themselves at times of crisis and give their best to overcome any financial or worklife hardships. I strongly believe it is a far pleasurable to give our fullest to overcome such situations than to constantly regret about ones job or status, arguments of the both groups will be discussed in the following paragraph.
On the one hand, many people are extremly grateful for even a tiny opportunity they have recieved in their life, for instance, many people even in this contemporary era don’t have a formal university education which directly influence the employer’s expectancy and creates a hesitancy to hire such candidates for big corporate firms. This creates a void among people, and they began to appreciate jobs that are either satisfactory or aids them to be financially stable.
On the other hand, some people irrespective of their qualifications wants to uplift their way of living and usually don’t wish to settle for little. These people are relatively optimistic than the other group, this mindset helps them to seek variety of opportunities in their life rather weep and linger in bad situations.
To conclude,Many people are pessimistic and don’t care much even when their worklife is at stake, I believe this might be because of poor motivation and their attitude to settle for things easily, this may suit small proportion of people, whereas other people are aiming for much bigger targets that will improve their standard of living. I solely support the later, because they are fighters not followers.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-07 | sangeeth28 | 67 | view |
- two maps show road access to a city hospital in the years 2007 and 2010 summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 67
- some people feel that Criminial activities should be controlled by police force and not to use more radical measures to cleanse the root cause Discuss your opinion 78
- some people say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading people to buy their products Other people think advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it discuss both views and provide your opinion 89
- Humans might speak one language someday in future Do you agree or disagree 73
- the chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 219, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ive of its destructive tendancy towards ones job or wealth, while others contradict ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 525, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...uations than to constantly regret about ones job or status, arguments of the both gr...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...or aids them to be financially stable. On the other hand, some people irrespect...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Many
...linger in bad situations. To conclude,Many people are pessimistic and don’t care m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, whereas, while, for instance, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21621621622 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80495752296 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 16.0721442886 50% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 37.0 20.2975951904 182% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 110.389084605 49.4020404114 223% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 193.0 106.682146367 181% => OK
Words per sentence: 37.0 20.7667163134 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185737575312 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0783041491765 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630889532507 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109582682116 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0760195227615 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.7 13.0946893788 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.92 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 11.3001002004 157% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.59 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 9.78957915832 281% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.8 10.1190380762 166% => OK
text_standard: 28.0 10.7795591182 260% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.