Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life. Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals, companies and society. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many are of the view that individuals should not be involved in a secure job for life. Others say that the persistence of one's occupation generates values for themselves and the society as a whole. I would concur with the former notion on the grounds of personal development and benefits in the long run.
On the one hand, the option to maintain the current status could be explained by several reasons, chief of which is related to the merits in terms of both relationships between colleagues and financial security for senior positions. Staff who devote the entire worklife to a company witness significant changes in the process of recruitment. Hence, the bonds between those who choose to stay and overcome suffering during the progress of business are strengthened and closer than ever and this reason is owing to human fundamental need of mental well-being and socializing. With regards to the remuneration packages offered for senior staff, the financial advantages which they derive from their contribution to the company and thus for their experience are undoubtedly tremendous. This group often holds management and key positions of the company so their insurances are also really well.
On the other hand, I fervently believe that alternating between occupations could profoundly bring ample opportunities for individuals to develop and sharpen skills in many aspects. While integrating an alien environment, workers are able to cultivate social skills such as communication, presentation and exchanging professions and ideas in different contexts. Furthermore, they may encounter different thinking from diverse perspectives and visions, from peers to managers, which could foster critical thinking and broaden their horizon. Both of the aforementioned factors will result in a dynamic working environment for staff and promote further co-operations, which is in turn beneficial to individuals even when they leave the company. The learnt implications from the previous job could be useful in the upcoming one as long as they could optimize the use of their skill set and seize the opportunities to be the outstandings.
To conclude, although perpetuating the chosen career may be secured in certain aspects, I believe the option to change is more reasonable to nurture the internal qualities of a person at the best.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-19 | hien3112 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-09 | Charles Le | 61 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | Master Panda | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | cynnie.chan | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-01 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that no one should do the same job for all their working life Others argue that doing the same job brings advantages for individuals companies and society Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Today different types of robots are being developed which can serve as companions and workers to help at work and at home Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Many students find it difficult to pay attention at school What are the reasons for this What could be done to solve this problem 84
- Economic growth in recent years made some people in both developed countries and developing countries richer However research shows that while people in developing countries are happier people in developed countries seem not happier than before Why does t 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 123, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ife. Others say that the persistence of ones occupation generates values for themsel...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, really, so, then, thus, well, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39617486339 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04883388164 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587431693989 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.8308722186 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.071428571 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35714285714 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206204795938 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0721741143068 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733663285034 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11971814045 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0717729417847 0.056905535591 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.19 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.