Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important. To what extent agree or disagree?
It is agrued that planning for the future is a waste of time since individuals believe that paying attention on the present is more neccessary. From my point of view, in some situation i mostly disagree with this notion because of its drawbacks affection for the population life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that numerous citizens have been replaced by new innovation such as automatic robots, so appropriate orientation is greatly significant for the society. Not only can postgraduate have more opportunity to achieve in large companies which improve the financial of their nation, but also the creative and imagination of the people will be improved dramatically, advancing their mentality life. Furthermore, this phenomenon provide the great motivation and inspiration for adolesence which encorage their economic background. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Chert Roise, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of teenager in London who have right orientation. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has got a plenty of achievement in their career.
However, we can not negate the importance of focusing on the present for the society. The population can be more concentrate on their reality life and also socioeconomic will be narrowed where all people have the samoe chance to get their own occupation, reducing the percentage of unemployment ad homeless people in their country. Moreover, student can avoid to social-evil such as drugs, necotetin or other types of addicted, various positive influence will be lead by this trends.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally disagree with this statement, but focusing on the present still have merits aspect for the young generations. Each person need to have clear plans to improve themselves for the nation development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 73
- Today family members do not eat meals together Is this a positive or negative trend 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh disadvantages 89
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...numerous citizens have been replaced by new innovation such as automatic robots, so appropriat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ious positive influence will be lead by this trends. To conclude, by my agrument fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33876221498 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95057914725 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.349232185 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206516422939 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760870988131 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916533726224 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138727810456 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850853055879 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...numerous citizens have been replaced by new innovation such as automatic robots, so appropriat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 471, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ious positive influence will be lead by this trends. To conclude, by my agrument fr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33876221498 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95057914725 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605863192182 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.349232185 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6153846154 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206516422939 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760870988131 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916533726224 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138727810456 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0850853055879 0.056905535591 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.