Some people believe that planning for the future is a waste of time because they think that focusing on the present is more important. To what extent agree or disagree?
It is agrued that planning for the future is a waste of time since individuals believe that paying attention on the present is more neccessary. From my point of view, in some situation i mostly disagree with this notion because of its drawbacks affection for the population life. The following essay will analyse this statement in detail.
First of all, in the international world and with the appearence of modern technology that numerous citizens have been replaced by new innovation such as automatic robots, so appropriate orientation is greatly significant for the society. Not only can postgraduate have more opportunity to achieve in large companies which improve the financial of their nation, but also the creative and imagination of the people will be improved dramatically, advancing their mentality life. Furthermore, this phenomenon provide the great motivation and inspiration for adolesence which encorage their economic background. To illustrate, there was a vurvey by Chert Roise, the famous scientist and professor which was about the success of teenager in London who have right orientation. The statistic showed that nearly everyone has got a plenty of achievement in their career.
However, we can not negate the importance of focusing on the present for the society. The population can be more concentrate on their reality life and also socioeconomic will be narrowed where all people have the samoe chance to get their own occupation, reducing the percentage of unemployment ad homeless people in their country. Moreover, various positive influence will be lead by this trends.
To conclude, by my agrument from the essay that i totally disagree with this statement, but focusing on the present still have merits aspect for the young generations. Each person need to have clear plans to improve themselves for the nation development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-13 | hieu13092006 | 67 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid Do you agree or disagree 78
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment such as the South Pole What are advantages and disadvantages of this development 78
- Many foods are shipped from far away Some people think that eating local food is more environmentally and economically friendly Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- Individuals should not be allowed to carry guns as it increases crime and violence in society To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
It is agrued that planning for the futur...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill analyse this statement in detail. First of all, in the international world...
^^
Line 2, column 134, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovation'.
Suggestion: innovation
...numerous citizens have been replaced by new innovation such as automatic robots, so appropriat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plenty of achievement in their career. However, we can not negate the importanc...
^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ious positive influence will be lead by this trends. To conclude, by my agrument...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nfluence will be lead by this trends. To conclude, by my agrument from the ess...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, still, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34812286689 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95503623736 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3312882469 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.538461538 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61538461538 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211375176201 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0760870988131 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916533726224 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141577841063 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839396525401 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.