Some people believe that playing games and watching TV is beneficial but other say it doesn't improve mental ability of children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is certainly true that the technology has drastic changed on society, especially the children. Many people argue that spending time behind television and computer, which is essential for children's development; however, on the other think that it's not useful for improving psychological fitness. In my perspective, I strongly agree with this statement with supporting example will be explained below.
To begin with, the most detrimental effect of the above notion is that the children can learn of violent due to broadcasting a crime related episode. For example, Government of America carried a survey regarding crime and show that younger people occurred more crime in last decade because of watching different types violence serial and web-series. Apart from this, children can spend more time on television and computer games, then which will not easily obtain desire score in education. It can be seen that which also impact on their education.
Secondly, many fighting games create a different task. If they cannot complete theses task, then they fall in depression and after some mental health. For instance, recently one youngster committed a crime due to did not finish enemy in PUBG game. As a result, more spending this types of games some time people started bad activities as killing a crime and other wrong doing.
Last but not least, children can learn about spending sedentary lifestyles for watching different movie on TV. As a result, they cannot prefer to spend behind physical activities as playing outdoor games, yoga, cycling and many others. Consequently, this children will face different health related problem in future.
In recapitulation, children can learn about different bad activities as crime, less focus on their education and importantly they do not spend behind physical activity, which all things children can learn from television and computer games.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-15 | vedant.vp2010@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Individual can do nothing to help improve the environment only Government and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 38
- Some people say that in our modern age it is unnecessary to teach children about the skills of handwriting To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some expert believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary schools Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people believe that playing games and watching TV is beneficial but other say it doesn t improve mental ability of children To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In many cities today most people live in large apartment blocks Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... cycling and many others. Consequently, this children will face different health rel...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...l face different health related problem in future. In recapitulation, children can learn...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36241610738 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69130027269 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4974001501 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148574177708 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496545385523 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313862594152 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856498112945 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281176615985 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 250, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... cycling and many others. Consequently, this children will face different health rel...
^^^^
Line 4, column 307, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...l face different health related problem in future. In recapitulation, children can learn...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, apart from, for example, for instance, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1598.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36241610738 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69130027269 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573825503356 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4974001501 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.533333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148574177708 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496545385523 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0313862594152 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856498112945 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0281176615985 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.