Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers. Some disagree. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a heated debate about whether the high pay for trending music stars is worth their abilities or it is classical musician who deserves a better earning. From my personal standpoint, notwithstanding that both viewpoints bear their own merits, I would content with the former.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that there are plenty of reasons backed up for pop stars’ high income. First and foremost, it can be attributed to their cramped schedule with regular recording time and countless performance tour. Not only top-tier singers have to endure heavier workload and longer working hours but they also have the responsibility to satisfy the audience’s demands. Hence, the more their salary, the more their contribution to the entertainment industry. Secondly, we are all acknowledge that trending singer normally have a short-lived career, which means that they only earn the most during their golden time. That can be the explanation for why most of them would do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their life. In the case of a famous Korean boy group - HOT, the press are now considered their style and music as out-dated and are no longer in the mass public’s preference, and it is cleared that their income is a lot lower than that in their golden period.
On the second hand, we can not take the talents of classical musician for granted. All classical performers have to go under persistent training with endless practicing hours and strict requirements with the aim to meet the highly demand of the classical field. Moreover, it has been widely considered for centuries that classical music is the wealth’s priority. Since this genre mostly serve for those from the upper class, classical singers’ income go in accordance with their audiences’ budget.
In the nutshell, despite the fact that both careers have their own difficulties, I still advocate that pop stars are more worthy of a higher income because of their burdensome duty.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 78 | view |
2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
2022-08-01 | nhattram39 | 84 | view |
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 84
- Some people argue job satisfaction is more important than job security Others believe a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 73
- The diagram below shows the design for a wind turbine and its location 78
- The maps show the changes made to a small museum and its surroundings in 1990 and 2010 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 644, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...most during their golden time. That can be the explanation for why most of them wo...
^^
Line 3, column 730, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...do their best in these prosperous years so as to make ends meet for the rest of their li...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1681.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03293413174 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72845291974 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580838323353 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3857407675 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.071428571 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.21428571429 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126018492359 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0492991687137 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0341668265318 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946107003468 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0246971382401 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.